A Survey-Based Assessment of Knowledge and Practices Regarding Implant Prosthesis Insertion Protocols in Dental Practice
Abstract Background: Dental implants are a preferred treatment modality for missing teeth due to their durability and functionality. However, their success largely depends on adherence to correct prosthesis insertion protocols. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the awareness and practice of dental implant prosthesis insertion protocols among dental professionals at varying levels of experience. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 117 participants, including dental postgraduates, practitioners, and faculty. The questionnaire assessed knowledge and preferences related to implant systems, abutment types, prosthesis types, cementation materials, and insertion protocols. Statistical analysis was performed using OpenEpi software with a significance level set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: While the majority demonstrated awareness of implant protocols, significant differences existed between professional groups regarding preferred prosthesis types, cementation materials, and protocol adherence. Faculty and practitioners showed higher awareness compared to postgraduates. Glass ionomer cement was the most preferred cementing agent. Preferences in loading protocols, screw access filling materials, and follow-up patterns also varied. Conclusion: The study highlights a need for standardized education and training to bridge knowledge gaps, especially among early-career dental professionals. Structured curricular changes and continuing education programs are recommended to ensure optimal patient outcomes.
Authors
- International Journal of Medical Science and Innovative Research (IJMSIR)
Institutions
- Innovative Research (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2025-08-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18082469
- Primary Topic
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00