The Impact of Donating Human Milk on the Health of the Donor and Their Infant: Evidence from Two Systematic Reviews

Using human milk has been associated with decreased morbidity and mortality in preterm/low birth weight infants. Donor human milk is recommended when maternal milk is unavailable. The benefits of donor human milk for the recipient are well documented, but the impact of donation on donors and their infants is not clear. We aimed to evaluate the effects of donation human milk on donors and their infants. Literature searches were conducted (April 2024) to identify studies (observational, quasi-experimental, and randomized control trials) assessing the impact of human milk donation on donor health, nutrition, well-being, and lactation and on their infants' health, growth, and development. Bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions scale. Meta-analysis was conducted when possible. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Nine studies examined donor outcomes, and 6 studies examined donor infant outcomes. No differences were found between donors and nondonors regarding the prevalence of overweight [risk ratio (RR): 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81, 2.01], postpartum depression (RR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.21, 1.72), postpartum anxiety (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.18), need to pump for their infant (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.63, 1.89), mastitis (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 0.71, 3.05), chapped/cracked nipples (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.34, 1.12), and breast engorgement (RR: 1.88; 95% CI: 0.94, 3.77). Similarly, no differences were found between donor and nondonor infants regarding feeding intolerance (vomiting) (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.53, 3.01), slow weight gain (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.13, 1.02), oral thrush (RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.12, 2.37), or need for phototherapy (RR: 2.21; 95% CI: 0.93, 5.23). The certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. Limited, very low certainty evidence does not support any short-term harms or benefits of human milk donation for donors or their infants. The protocols for both studies were registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on March 26, 2024. Study IDs: CRD42024529222 and CRD42024528803.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Nutrition
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100581
Primary Topic
Infant Nutrition and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Donating Human Milk on the Health of the Donor and Their Infant: Evidence from Two Systematic Reviews

Tarah T. Colaizy, Alaina Berg, Aamer Imdad, James A. Evans et al.
Advances in Nutrition
Infant Nutrition and Health
article

The Impact of Donating Human Milk on the Health of the Donor and Their Infant: Evidence from Two Systematic Reviews

Tarah T. Colaizy, Alaina Berg, Aamer Imdad, James A. Evans, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, Kendall E. Baier, Jaimie Rogner, Mohammed H. Murad, Abigail Smith
article en

Abstract

Using human milk has been associated with decreased morbidity and mortality in preterm/low birth weight infants. Donor human milk is recommended when maternal milk is unavailable. The benefits of donor human milk for the recipient are well documented, but the impact of donation on donors and their infants is not clear. We aimed to evaluate the effects of donation human milk on donors and their infants. Literature searches were conducted (April 2024) to identify studies (observational, quasi-experimental, and randomized control trials) assessing the impact of human milk donation on donor health, nutrition, well-being, and lactation and on their infants' health, growth, and development. Bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions scale. Meta-analysis was conducted when possible. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Nine studies examined donor outcomes, and 6 studies examined donor infant outcomes. No differences were found between donors and nondonors regarding the prevalence of overweight [risk ratio (RR): 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81, 2.01], postpartum depression (RR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.21, 1.72), postpartum anxiety (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.18), need to pump for their infant (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.63, 1.89), mastitis (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 0.71, 3.05), chapped/cracked nipples (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.34, 1.12), and breast engorgement (RR: 1.88; 95% CI: 0.94, 3.77). Similarly, no differences were found between donor and nondonor infants regarding feeding intolerance (vomiting) (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.53, 3.01), slow weight gain (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.13, 1.02), oral thrush (RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.12, 2.37), or need for phototherapy (RR: 2.21; 95% CI: 0.93, 5.23). The certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. Limited, very low certainty evidence does not support any short-term harms or benefits of human milk donation for donors or their infants. The protocols for both studies were registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on March 26, 2024. Study IDs: CRD42024529222 and CRD42024528803.

Advances in NutritionVol. 17(2)
University of Iowa (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), Cornell University (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Centre for Global Health Research (CA), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Infant Nutrition and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.