Menteeship as power: Global health must Rethink how it grows its leaders

Within global and public health practice, emerging professionals navigate cross-cultural, power-laden systems shaped by donor influence, colonial legacies, and entrenched hierarchies that stifle mentorship’s transformative potential [1]. Although often framed as a collaborative alliance for mutual growth [2], mentorship remains largely mentor-centric, concentrating power and success in established figures and fostering dependency on mentor agency, access, and authority. This approach is not tailor-fit for today’s volatile realities. Evidence from low- and middle-income country programs shows that meaningful growth hinges on the mentee’s ability to negotiate these asymmetries [3]. In these settings marked by linguistic diversity, multi-generational teams, and transnational norms, such self-agency is indispensable. We therefore center “menteeship” within the alliance, as a disciplined practice of self-agency, strategic learning, and ethical reflexivity within power-sensitive ecosystems [1]. We also identify common pitfalls, offer a practical toolkit, and outline its operationalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005446
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Menteeship as power: Global health must Rethink how it grows its leaders

Robert Kokou Dowou, Sidney Sangong, Ojong Samuel Akombeng, Luchuo Engelbert Bain et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

Menteeship as power: Global health must Rethink how it grows its leaders

Robert Kokou Dowou, Sidney Sangong, Ojong Samuel Akombeng, Luchuo Engelbert Bain, Bate Effim Chloran Louise, Ngo Bibaa Lundi-Anne Omam
article en

Abstract

Within global and public health practice, emerging professionals navigate cross-cultural, power-laden systems shaped by donor influence, colonial legacies, and entrenched hierarchies that stifle mentorship’s transformative potential [1]. Although often framed as a collaborative alliance for mutual growth [2], mentorship remains largely mentor-centric, concentrating power and success in established figures and fostering dependency on mentor agency, access, and authority. This approach is not tailor-fit for today’s volatile realities. Evidence from low- and middle-income country programs shows that meaningful growth hinges on the mentee’s ability to negotiate these asymmetries [3]. In these settings marked by linguistic diversity, multi-generational teams, and transnational norms, such self-agency is indispensable. We therefore center “menteeship” within the alliance, as a disciplined practice of self-agency, strategic learning, and ethical reflexivity within power-sensitive ecosystems [1]. We also identify common pitfalls, offer a practical toolkit, and outline its operationalization.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(12)
University of Nairobi (KE), University of Buea (CM), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Health and Allied Sciences (GH), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Bridge University (SS), Grupo João Ferreira dos Santos (Mozambique) (MZ), African Population and Health Research Center (KE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.