Știrile False: Câteva Sugestii De Analiză

Abstract The article argues that fake news is not a modern invention but a long-standing practice that has gained unprecedented scale and impact in the contemporary “post-truth” era. While global events such as elections, Brexit, and the war in Ukraine have intensified scholarly interest in fake news, research on this phenomenon in Romanian remains limited, despite clear societal vulnerabilities in Romania and the Republic of Moldova. The article highlights major challenges in studying fake news, including definitional ambiguity, verification difficulties, and the subjective evaluation of truth and falsity. Existing communication-focused and computational approaches are shown to be methodologically insufficient, particularly due to weak typologies and limited linguistic insight. To address these gaps, the article proposes a clear definition of fake news and a refined taxonomy of news types, advocating for qualitative, linguistically grounded analyses alongside quantitative methods, with special attention to Romanian-language corpora.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Caietele "Lucian Blaga"
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/clb-2024-0001
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Știrile False: Câteva Sugestii De Analiză

Simina-Maria Terian
Caietele "Lucian Blaga"
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Știrile False: Câteva Sugestii De Analiză

Simina-Maria Terian
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article argues that fake news is not a modern invention but a long-standing practice that has gained unprecedented scale and impact in the contemporary “post-truth” era. While global events such as elections, Brexit, and the war in Ukraine have intensified scholarly interest in fake news, research on this phenomenon in Romanian remains limited, despite clear societal vulnerabilities in Romania and the Republic of Moldova. The article highlights major challenges in studying fake news, including definitional ambiguity, verification difficulties, and the subjective evaluation of truth and falsity. Existing communication-focused and computational approaches are shown to be methodologically insufficient, particularly due to weak typologies and limited linguistic insight. To address these gaps, the article proposes a clear definition of fake news and a refined taxonomy of news types, advocating for qualitative, linguistically grounded analyses alongside quantitative methods, with special attention to Romanian-language corpora.

Caietele "Lucian Blaga"Vol. 25(1-2)
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Știrile False: Câteva Sugestii De Analiză — Simina-Maria Terian · Caietele "Lucian Blaga" (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS