Duramesh™ versus conventional suture for prevention of trocar-site hernia following laparoscopic surgery (TROCAR): study protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial
Authors
Lawrence Nip (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5816-7151)
Samuel G. Parker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3710-9953)
Paul Bassett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7830-4563)
Sarah Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5196-1563)
Steve Halligan
David A. Ross (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6353-6951)
C. Brew-Graves
on behalf of the Study of Advanced Cardiac Life Support for Ventricular Fibrillation with Extracorporeal Circulation in Japan II (SAVE-J II) study group
Duramesh™ versus conventional suture for prevention of trocar-site hernia following laparoscopic surgery (TROCAR): study protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial
Lawrence Nip, Samuel G. Parker, Paul Bassett, Sarah Zhao et al.
Journal
Trials
Topics
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
article
Duramesh™ versus conventional suture for prevention of trocar-site hernia following laparoscopic surgery (TROCAR): study protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial
Lawrence Nip, Samuel G. Parker, Paul Bassett, Sarah Zhao, Steve Halligan, David A. Ross, C. Brew-Graves, on behalf of the Study of Advanced Cardiac Life Support for Ventricular Fibrillation with Extracorporeal Circulation in Japan II (SAVE-J II) study group, Alastair C. J. Windsor, Rhys Thomas
article en
Abstract
No abstract available for this paper.
Publication Tag
TrialsVol. 27(1)
Institutions
Amersham Hospital (GB), London Clinic (GB), Croydon University Hospital (GB), The Princess Grace Hospital (GB), University College London (GB)