Preventing Prescription Stimulant Diversion and Misuse via a Web-Based Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Prescription stimulant diversion (i.e., giving, selling, or trading one's medication) and non-medical prescription stimulant use (i.e., using in ways not prescribed) are common among undergraduates; however, few evidence-based interventions target these behaviors. This study evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of a 30-min, interactive web-based intervention providing psychoeducation around diversion and non-medical use, practice refusing medication requests, and medication adherence strategies. Students (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 20.42 years; 74% female; 86% White) with current stimulant prescriptions from three US universities were randomized to the intervention (<i>n</i> = 128) or attention-matched placebo (<i>n</i> = 121) in a single-blind design, with 1- and 2-month boosters and 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Primary outcomes were diversion, non-medical use, and diversion intentions; secondary outcomes were perceived norms, perceived risk, self-efficacy to resist diversion and non-medical use, and prescriber communication. Contrary to pre-registered hypotheses, intervention participants did not report decreases in primary outcomes. There were small-to-medium effects on secondary outcomes of risk perceptions (<i>d</i> = 0.39 [0.12, 0.68]), perceived non-medical use norms (<i>d</i> = 0.51 [0.24, 0.76]), and self-efficacy to avoid non-medical use (<i>d</i> = 0.47 [0.10, 0.85]), but not on perceived diversion norms, self-efficacy to avoid diversion, and prescriber communication. Post-hoc analyses showed a 76% reduction in odds of <i>any</i> diversion (<i>OR</i> = 0.24 [0.08, 0.68]) and a 60% reduction of <i>any</i> non-medical use (<i>OR</i> = 0.40 [0.21, 0.77]) for intervention participants during the 6-month follow-up period. This intervention was acceptable and feasible to implement and evidenced some efficacy in modifying risk perceptions, self-efficacy, and perceived norms. Since diversion and misuse episodes were not reduced, future intervention refinements may tailor content to different levels of diversion and misuse risk. Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on May 12, 2021: NCT04885166.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251405545
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preventing Prescription Stimulant Diversion and Misuse via a Web-Based Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Alison Looby, Laura J. Holt, Richard Feinn, Ty S. Schepis
Journal of Attention Disorders
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Preventing Prescription Stimulant Diversion and Misuse via a Web-Based Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Alison Looby, Laura J. Holt, Richard Feinn, Ty S. Schepis
article en

Abstract

Prescription stimulant diversion (i.e., giving, selling, or trading one's medication) and non-medical prescription stimulant use (i.e., using in ways not prescribed) are common among undergraduates; however, few evidence-based interventions target these behaviors. This study evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of a 30-min, interactive web-based intervention providing psychoeducation around diversion and non-medical use, practice refusing medication requests, and medication adherence strategies. Students (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 20.42 years; 74% female; 86% White) with current stimulant prescriptions from three US universities were randomized to the intervention (<i>n</i> = 128) or attention-matched placebo (<i>n</i> = 121) in a single-blind design, with 1- and 2-month boosters and 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Primary outcomes were diversion, non-medical use, and diversion intentions; secondary outcomes were perceived norms, perceived risk, self-efficacy to resist diversion and non-medical use, and prescriber communication. Contrary to pre-registered hypotheses, intervention participants did not report decreases in primary outcomes. There were small-to-medium effects on secondary outcomes of risk perceptions (<i>d</i> = 0.39 [0.12, 0.68]), perceived non-medical use norms (<i>d</i> = 0.51 [0.24, 0.76]), and self-efficacy to avoid non-medical use (<i>d</i> = 0.47 [0.10, 0.85]), but not on perceived diversion norms, self-efficacy to avoid diversion, and prescriber communication. Post-hoc analyses showed a 76% reduction in odds of <i>any</i> diversion (<i>OR</i> = 0.24 [0.08, 0.68]) and a 60% reduction of <i>any</i> non-medical use (<i>OR</i> = 0.40 [0.21, 0.77]) for intervention participants during the 6-month follow-up period. This intervention was acceptable and feasible to implement and evidenced some efficacy in modifying risk perceptions, self-efficacy, and perceived norms. Since diversion and misuse episodes were not reduced, future intervention refinements may tailor content to different levels of diversion and misuse risk. Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on May 12, 2021: NCT04885166.

Journal of Attention DisordersVol. 30(2)
University of Wyoming (US), Texas State University (US), Quinnipiac University (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States), Trinity College (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.