PANDA-PLUS: Improved dataset of prostate whole slide images from PANDA Challenge with pixel-level expert annotations

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based prostate cancer detection through whole slide images (WSIs) offers promising potential to address the global pathologist shortage while improving clinical consistency. Digital slides and improving image analysis methods encourage the creation of tools to aid in WSI classification. Despite promising advances, these tools are still limited by available training data. Current publicly available datasets, such as Kaggle's PANDA Challenge, while large in scale, rely on slide-level labels that may introduce noise and limit model reliability. Others contain detailed annotations, but are smaller in size due to manual processing efforts. In this work, we introduce PANDA-PLUS, a 546-image dataset derived from PANDA images with improved pixel-level annotations, as well as an accompanying annotation pipeline that reduces pathologists' time commitment. We present a detailed comparative analysis between PANDA-PLUS and PANDA using Gleason score and ISUP grade, supported by agreement values, κ, and PABAK under multiple weighting schemes. The results demonstrate consistently lower grading in PANDA-PLUS, with disagreement patterns especially pronounced at higher grades. We also demonstrate through single rater grading of various annotation granularities how slide- and patch-level labels may distort grading proportions and alter image scores. PANDA-PLUS not only improves annotation granularity and reduces label noise but also exposes potential grading errors in the original PANDA dataset. We present PANDA-PLUS's annotations as an improved alternative to the PANDA labels and conclude that it represents a step forward in the development of higher-quality public datasets for clinical AI applications in prostate cancer pathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100540
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PANDA-PLUS: Improved dataset of prostate whole slide images from PANDA Challenge with pixel-level expert annotations

Lauren Laverty, Paul M. Urie, Dennis Della Corte, Spencer Hopson et al.
Journal of Pathology Informatics
AI in cancer detection
article

PANDA-PLUS: Improved dataset of prostate whole slide images from PANDA Challenge with pixel-level expert annotations

Lauren Laverty, Paul M. Urie, Dennis Della Corte, Spencer Hopson, Carson Mildon, Joshua L. Ebbert, Corbyn Kubalek, Ryan Vance
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based prostate cancer detection through whole slide images (WSIs) offers promising potential to address the global pathologist shortage while improving clinical consistency. Digital slides and improving image analysis methods encourage the creation of tools to aid in WSI classification. Despite promising advances, these tools are still limited by available training data. Current publicly available datasets, such as Kaggle's PANDA Challenge, while large in scale, rely on slide-level labels that may introduce noise and limit model reliability. Others contain detailed annotations, but are smaller in size due to manual processing efforts. In this work, we introduce PANDA-PLUS, a 546-image dataset derived from PANDA images with improved pixel-level annotations, as well as an accompanying annotation pipeline that reduces pathologists' time commitment. We present a detailed comparative analysis between PANDA-PLUS and PANDA using Gleason score and ISUP grade, supported by agreement values, κ, and PABAK under multiple weighting schemes. The results demonstrate consistently lower grading in PANDA-PLUS, with disagreement patterns especially pronounced at higher grades. We also demonstrate through single rater grading of various annotation granularities how slide- and patch-level labels may distort grading proportions and alter image scores. PANDA-PLUS not only improves annotation granularity and reduces label noise but also exposes potential grading errors in the original PANDA dataset. We present PANDA-PLUS's annotations as an improved alternative to the PANDA labels and conclude that it represents a step forward in the development of higher-quality public datasets for clinical AI applications in prostate cancer pathology.

Journal of Pathology InformaticsVol. 20
Brigham Young University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.