Key Farm-to-Fork Factors Influencing E. coli Levels in Pastured Poultry Production

Pastured poultry farms offer a unique model for investigating microbial ecology in less controlled environments, presenting challenges and opportunities for food safety management. This study aims to identify the key factors that influence <i>Escherichia coli</i> levels with two complementary modeling approaches: a linear mixed-effect model (LMM) and a random forest (RF) model. Data were collected from 11 pastured poultry farms in the southeastern United States from 2014 to 2017. Five sample types were analyzed: soil (<i>n</i> = 812), feces (<i>n</i> = 817), ceca (<i>n</i> = 206), postprocessing whole carcass rinse (WCR-P; <i>n</i> = 235), and final product whole carcass rinse (WCR-F; <i>n</i> = 230). Two different sets of predictor variables were used separately: 1) 32 farming practices and 26 physicochemical properties and 2) 80 meteorological factors. The model performance was compared with the randomized mean squared error (RMSE) with a test dataset. LMM was not used for meteorological factors because of the multicollinearity. Significant differences (α = 0.05) in <i>E. coli</i> levels were observed between all sample types, with feces samples showing the highest level. Compared to LMMs, RF models generally showed higher predictive accuracy (lower RMSE) on the test dataset. For soil samples, higher pH and sodium levels were linked to higher <i>E. coli</i> levels. The same trend with pH was observed in fecal samples. WCR-P samples showed that the organic acid treatment in the rinse water led to lower <i>E. coli</i> levels than other treatments. In WCR-F samples, longer storage time led to lower <i>E. coli</i> levels. Meteorological factors showed a weaker relationship with <i>E. coli</i> levels compared to farming practices and physicochemical properties, but in soil samples, mild and stable temperature played an important role in <i>E. coli</i> survival. This study can help stakeholders develop data-driven management strategies targeting key factors to aid in the reduction of food safety and animal health risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Avian Diseases
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-d-25-00033
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key Farm-to-Fork Factors Influencing E. coli Levels in Pastured Poultry Production

Walid Ghazi Al Hakeem, M. Kim, Michael J. Rothrock
Avian Diseases
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Key Farm-to-Fork Factors Influencing E. coli Levels in Pastured Poultry Production

Walid Ghazi Al Hakeem, M. Kim, Michael J. Rothrock
article en

Abstract

Pastured poultry farms offer a unique model for investigating microbial ecology in less controlled environments, presenting challenges and opportunities for food safety management. This study aims to identify the key factors that influence <i>Escherichia coli</i> levels with two complementary modeling approaches: a linear mixed-effect model (LMM) and a random forest (RF) model. Data were collected from 11 pastured poultry farms in the southeastern United States from 2014 to 2017. Five sample types were analyzed: soil (<i>n</i> = 812), feces (<i>n</i> = 817), ceca (<i>n</i> = 206), postprocessing whole carcass rinse (WCR-P; <i>n</i> = 235), and final product whole carcass rinse (WCR-F; <i>n</i> = 230). Two different sets of predictor variables were used separately: 1) 32 farming practices and 26 physicochemical properties and 2) 80 meteorological factors. The model performance was compared with the randomized mean squared error (RMSE) with a test dataset. LMM was not used for meteorological factors because of the multicollinearity. Significant differences (α = 0.05) in <i>E. coli</i> levels were observed between all sample types, with feces samples showing the highest level. Compared to LMMs, RF models generally showed higher predictive accuracy (lower RMSE) on the test dataset. For soil samples, higher pH and sodium levels were linked to higher <i>E. coli</i> levels. The same trend with pH was observed in fecal samples. WCR-P samples showed that the organic acid treatment in the rinse water led to lower <i>E. coli</i> levels than other treatments. In WCR-F samples, longer storage time led to lower <i>E. coli</i> levels. Meteorological factors showed a weaker relationship with <i>E. coli</i> levels compared to farming practices and physicochemical properties, but in soil samples, mild and stable temperature played an important role in <i>E. coli</i> survival. This study can help stakeholders develop data-driven management strategies targeting key factors to aid in the reduction of food safety and animal health risk.

Avian DiseasesVol. 69(4)
University of Georgia (US), U.S. National Poultry Research Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.