Evaluation of visual patient predictive for enhancing level 3 situation awareness: protocol for a multicentre randomised computer-based simulation and diagnostic accuracy study (true positive rate, precision, average lead time)

The leading ethics committee (Zurich, Switzerland; BASEC-Req-2023-00465) reviewed and approved the study protocol. Ethics committees at the other participating centres have obtained their respective approvals or waivers. Bonn: 2025-144-BO, Boston: 2025P000501, Heidelberg: S-376/2025, Munich: 2025-357 W-CB. As this simulation study involves only healthcare professionals performing prediction tasks based on simulated vital sign scenarios-without collection of patient data or any medically relevant personal data-it does not constitute human subjects research under applicable regulations. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-109171
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of visual patient predictive for enhancing level 3 situation awareness: protocol for a multicentre randomised computer-based simulation and diagnostic accuracy study (true positive rate, precision, average lead time)

Markus Kalisch, David W. Tscholl, Sebastian Daniel Sahli, Luca J. Wachtendorf et al.
BMJ Open
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Evaluation of visual patient predictive for enhancing level 3 situation awareness: protocol for a multicentre randomised computer-based simulation and diagnostic accuracy study (true positive rate, precision, average lead time)

Markus Kalisch, David W. Tscholl, Sebastian Daniel Sahli, Luca J. Wachtendorf, Johannes Schäfer, Christoph B. Nöthiger, Christopher Neuhaus, Greta Gasciauskaite, Alina Dubatovka, Tadzio R. Roche, Stefan Schwerin, Cynthia A. Hunn, Max Ebensperger, Achilles Delis, Gaspar Dugac, Arend Rahrisch, Arian Karimitar, Hannes Bruns, Gregor Massoth
article en

Abstract

The leading ethics committee (Zurich, Switzerland; BASEC-Req-2023-00465) reviewed and approved the study protocol. Ethics committees at the other participating centres have obtained their respective approvals or waivers. Bonn: 2025-144-BO, Boston: 2025P000501, Heidelberg: S-376/2025, Munich: 2025-357 W-CB. As this simulation study involves only healthcare professionals performing prediction tasks based on simulated vital sign scenarios-without collection of patient data or any medically relevant personal data-it does not constitute human subjects research under applicable regulations. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

BMJ OpenVol. 15(12)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Bonn (DE), ETH Zurich (CH), Heidelberg University of Education (DE), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.