Reconfiguring Citizenship: Between Ius Sanguinis and Ius Soli in Italy and the United States

This essay examines the current reshaping of birthright citizenship by comparing the divergent paths of Italy and the United States. Historically dominated by ius sanguinis, Western legal traditions maintained a blood-based criterion for centuries; yet both countries now display signs of structural change. Italy, long committed to unlimited transmission of citizenship abroad, has recently restricted the reach of ius sanguinis through Decree-Law No. 36/2025, signalling growing concern over citizens with no effective ties to the Republic. Conversely, in the United States – traditionally the strongest ius soli jurisdiction – President Trump’s 2025 Executive Order introduces a restrictive reading of the Fourteenth Amendment, excluding from birthright citizenship the children of certain non-citizens. The ensuing judicial conflict reveals the fragility of a doctrine once considered settled. Together, these developments show that the balance between ius soli and ius sanguinis is undergoing a significant reconfiguration, whose long-term implications for political membership remain uncertain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Milan Law Review
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54103/milanlawreview/30257
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconfiguring Citizenship: Between Ius Sanguinis and Ius Soli in Italy and the United States

Lorenzo Gagliardi
Milan Law Review
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Reconfiguring Citizenship: Between Ius Sanguinis and Ius Soli in Italy and the United States

Lorenzo Gagliardi
article en

Abstract

This essay examines the current reshaping of birthright citizenship by comparing the divergent paths of Italy and the United States. Historically dominated by ius sanguinis, Western legal traditions maintained a blood-based criterion for centuries; yet both countries now display signs of structural change. Italy, long committed to unlimited transmission of citizenship abroad, has recently restricted the reach of ius sanguinis through Decree-Law No. 36/2025, signalling growing concern over citizens with no effective ties to the Republic. Conversely, in the United States – traditionally the strongest ius soli jurisdiction – President Trump’s 2025 Executive Order introduces a restrictive reading of the Fourteenth Amendment, excluding from birthright citizenship the children of certain non-citizens. The ensuing judicial conflict reveals the fragility of a doctrine once considered settled. Together, these developments show that the balance between ius soli and ius sanguinis is undergoing a significant reconfiguration, whose long-term implications for political membership remain uncertain.

Milan Law ReviewVol. 6(2)
University of Milan (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reconfiguring Citizenship: Between Ius Sanguinis and Ius Soli in Italy and the United States — Lorenzo Gagliardi · Milan Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS