Experimental radiological study on the readiness for real-world clinical application of an artificial intelligence-based program in dentistry

Background. Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving and gaining applications in various fields of medicine, including dentistry. In particular, AI systems for analyzing radiological data hold the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. However, challenges such as compliance with national regulatory standards and the adaptation of AI technologies to clinical practices in the Russian Federation remain significant obstacles. Aims. To evaluate the readiness of AI for real-world clinical application in dentistry in the Russian Federation by comparing the performance of the Diagnocat system with experienced dentists in the interpretation of radiological data. Materials and methods. The study included 100 radiological examinations (CBCT), each corresponding to a unique patient (55 women, 45 men; mean age 42.9±12.1 years). The evaluated parameters included the frequency of diagnostic errors, diagnostic accuracy (e.g., caries, periodontal diseases), and the average time required for data analysis. To assess the statistical significance of differences, the χ² test was applied. The results obtained using Diagnocat were verified and compared with those of clinicians, as confirmed by independent experts. Results. Diagnocat demonstrated no errors in the anterior region and fewer errors in the posterior region compared to dentists (4.86% vs. 7.29%). Diagnocat’s average analysis time was significantly shorter (4.18 minutes) compared to that of dentists (25.05 minutes). While Diagnocat showed high accuracy, some limitations were identified, including difficulties in interpreting complex anatomical structures and pathology severity. Conclusions. Diagnocat shows significant potential for integration into clinical dentistry in the Russian Federation, offering advantages in speed and accuracy under high workload conditions. However, further algorithm refinements and adaptations to Russian medical standards are necessary. The study highlights the value of combining AI capabilities with the clinical expertise of dentists to achieve optimal diagnostic outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Stomatology
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat2025180415
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental radiological study on the readiness for real-world clinical application of an artificial intelligence-based program in dentistry

V.N. Trezubov, T.N. Trofimova, K.Sh. Oisieva, R.A. Rozov et al.
Russian Journal of Stomatology
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Experimental radiological study on the readiness for real-world clinical application of an artificial intelligence-based program in dentistry

V.N. Trezubov, T.N. Trofimova, K.Sh. Oisieva, R.A. Rozov, V.R. Veber
article en

Abstract

Background. Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving and gaining applications in various fields of medicine, including dentistry. In particular, AI systems for analyzing radiological data hold the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. However, challenges such as compliance with national regulatory standards and the adaptation of AI technologies to clinical practices in the Russian Federation remain significant obstacles. Aims. To evaluate the readiness of AI for real-world clinical application in dentistry in the Russian Federation by comparing the performance of the Diagnocat system with experienced dentists in the interpretation of radiological data. Materials and methods. The study included 100 radiological examinations (CBCT), each corresponding to a unique patient (55 women, 45 men; mean age 42.9±12.1 years). The evaluated parameters included the frequency of diagnostic errors, diagnostic accuracy (e.g., caries, periodontal diseases), and the average time required for data analysis. To assess the statistical significance of differences, the χ² test was applied. The results obtained using Diagnocat were verified and compared with those of clinicians, as confirmed by independent experts. Results. Diagnocat demonstrated no errors in the anterior region and fewer errors in the posterior region compared to dentists (4.86% vs. 7.29%). Diagnocat’s average analysis time was significantly shorter (4.18 minutes) compared to that of dentists (25.05 minutes). While Diagnocat showed high accuracy, some limitations were identified, including difficulties in interpreting complex anatomical structures and pathology severity. Conclusions. Diagnocat shows significant potential for integration into clinical dentistry in the Russian Federation, offering advantages in speed and accuracy under high workload conditions. However, further algorithm refinements and adaptations to Russian medical standards are necessary. The study highlights the value of combining AI capabilities with the clinical expertise of dentists to achieve optimal diagnostic outcomes.

Russian Journal of StomatologyVol. 18(4)
St Petersburg University (RU), First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg (RU), St. Petersburg State Medical Academy "City Hospital No. 26" (RU), Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.