Pragmatic Challenges in Studies of Animal Acts. Interpreting Zoo-Communication from a Systemic Socio-Semiotic Perspective

Abstract Animals’ communicational acts are meta-studied based on a framework interrelating five aspects form, content, act, time, and space in a systemic perspective. Aspects relate to levels , sign, utterance, life-genre, and lifeworld and to processes . Six studies are investigated, positioning act as part of a web of communicational elements aiming at illustrating the pragmatic role act and life-genre play in sustaining animal life-functions. Re-interpretations of studies of signals, calls, and gestures further aim at enhancing the framework epistemologically and methodologically for the study of zoo-communicational pragmatics. It is suggested that since act tends to be treated as a limited category the field could benefit from a systemic perspective, one that allows balancing open-and closedness on all levels and between all aspects. Studies of great apes’ gestures are studied in particular, focusing which epistemic position acts have when communication is seen as systemic. The paper concludes that a socio-semiotic, systemic, and pragmatic framework can play a constructive role when designing and validating research on zoo-communicational acts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistic Frontiers
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2025-0017
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pragmatic Challenges in Studies of Animal Acts. Interpreting Zoo-Communication from a Systemic Socio-Semiotic Perspective

Sigmund Ongstad
Linguistic Frontiers
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Pragmatic Challenges in Studies of Animal Acts. Interpreting Zoo-Communication from a Systemic Socio-Semiotic Perspective

Sigmund Ongstad
article en

Abstract

Abstract Animals’ communicational acts are meta-studied based on a framework interrelating five aspects form, content, act, time, and space in a systemic perspective. Aspects relate to levels , sign, utterance, life-genre, and lifeworld and to processes . Six studies are investigated, positioning act as part of a web of communicational elements aiming at illustrating the pragmatic role act and life-genre play in sustaining animal life-functions. Re-interpretations of studies of signals, calls, and gestures further aim at enhancing the framework epistemologically and methodologically for the study of zoo-communicational pragmatics. It is suggested that since act tends to be treated as a limited category the field could benefit from a systemic perspective, one that allows balancing open-and closedness on all levels and between all aspects. Studies of great apes’ gestures are studied in particular, focusing which epistemic position acts have when communication is seen as systemic. The paper concludes that a socio-semiotic, systemic, and pragmatic framework can play a constructive role when designing and validating research on zoo-communicational acts.

Linguistic FrontiersVol. 8(3)
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pragmatic Challenges in Studies of Animal Acts. Interpreting Zoo-Communication from a Systemic Socio-Semiotic Perspective — Sigmund Ongstad · Linguistic Frontiers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS