Modelling of Ice-Jam Floods in the Lower Part of the Danube Basin: Case Studies During the Winters of 2011/2012 and 2016/2017

The design flood (DF) for flood defence systems for large rivers is typically determined by taking into account the maximum water levels of the year, which typically occur in Central Europe between May and June (rivers like the Danube, Tisza, and Sava).The DF is typically calculated using a 1% probability of a flood peak and an additional 0,8-1,2 meters of freeboard height.Hydraulic models have been also employed to analyze scenarios of probable maximum floods (PMF).Nevertheless, despite their substantial influence on flood processes, ice-jam floods (IJFs) are rarely taken into account.Compared to open-channel flooding, the processes controlling the formation of peak flood waves under ice-jam conditions are very different.Consequently, these processes must be incorporated into calculations for probable maximum floods due to ice jamming (PMFice).Despite recent advancements in instrumentation, modelling techniques, and laboratory research, accurately defining hydraulic parameters under ice-covered conditions still requires direct field measurements.This study utilizes published hydrometric data from gauging stations along the Serbian part of the Danube River during ice-jam events in the winters of 2011/2012 and 2016/2017.Case studies were selected on a river section identified as critical during these periods.The analyses presented in this paper indicate that the Manning roughness coefficient for the entire river channel, including the ice cover, is approximately nc 0.0186 ms -1/3 , while the coefficient for the ice sheet alone is estimated at ni 0.0145 ms -1/3 .Hydraulic modelling of the studied river section yielded a Manning coefficient for the main channel of n 0.0225 ms -1/3 , which may pose a challenge for designers.Since air-water friction is negligible in open-channel flow conditions, the hydraulic gradient under ice-covered flow conditions can be explained by the fact that it is roughly half of that in open-channel flow (R = H/2).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17559/tv-20250419002608
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling of Ice-Jam Floods in the Lower Part of the Danube Basin: Case Studies During the Winters of 2011/2012 and 2016/2017

Vladimir Mandić, Slobodan Kolaković, Kolaković Srđan
Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Modelling of Ice-Jam Floods in the Lower Part of the Danube Basin: Case Studies During the Winters of 2011/2012 and 2016/2017

Vladimir Mandić, Slobodan Kolaković, Kolaković Srđan
article en

Abstract

The design flood (DF) for flood defence systems for large rivers is typically determined by taking into account the maximum water levels of the year, which typically occur in Central Europe between May and June (rivers like the Danube, Tisza, and Sava).The DF is typically calculated using a 1% probability of a flood peak and an additional 0,8-1,2 meters of freeboard height.Hydraulic models have been also employed to analyze scenarios of probable maximum floods (PMF).Nevertheless, despite their substantial influence on flood processes, ice-jam floods (IJFs) are rarely taken into account.Compared to open-channel flooding, the processes controlling the formation of peak flood waves under ice-jam conditions are very different.Consequently, these processes must be incorporated into calculations for probable maximum floods due to ice jamming (PMFice).Despite recent advancements in instrumentation, modelling techniques, and laboratory research, accurately defining hydraulic parameters under ice-covered conditions still requires direct field measurements.This study utilizes published hydrometric data from gauging stations along the Serbian part of the Danube River during ice-jam events in the winters of 2011/2012 and 2016/2017.Case studies were selected on a river section identified as critical during these periods.The analyses presented in this paper indicate that the Manning roughness coefficient for the entire river channel, including the ice cover, is approximately nc 0.0186 ms -1/3 , while the coefficient for the ice sheet alone is estimated at ni 0.0145 ms -1/3 .Hydraulic modelling of the studied river section yielded a Manning coefficient for the main channel of n 0.0225 ms -1/3 , which may pose a challenge for designers.Since air-water friction is negligible in open-channel flow conditions, the hydraulic gradient under ice-covered flow conditions can be explained by the fact that it is roughly half of that in open-channel flow (R = H/2).

Tehnicki vjesnik - Technical GazetteVol. 33(1)
University of Kragujevac (RS), University of Novi Sad (RS)
Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação, CEEPUS
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.