Translation and validation of the Traditional Chinese European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Spiritual Well-Being 32 (EORTC QLQ-SWB32) in older adults with chronic illnesses: Factors influencing spiri

This study translated and validated the Traditional Chinese (Taiwan) version of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Spiritual Well-Being 32 (EORTC QLQ-SWB32) for older adults with chronic illnesses and examined factors influencing SWB. A cross-sectional study recruited 292 participants. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (overall Cronbach's α = 0.87), with subdomain Cronbach's α ranging from 0.77 to 0.87, and acceptable test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.76). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses confirmed consistency of the domain structure with the original version, supporting its construct validity. Multiple regression analyses showed that demographic characteristics, chronic disease status, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) significantly influenced SWB (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 21.6%-41.0%), with the Existential domain most affected. Religious belief, higher education levels, and employment-based income may be potential independent protective factors for SWB, whereas stroke, anxiety/depression, and pain/discomfort may be potential risk factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251391778
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation and validation of the Traditional Chinese European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Spiritual Well-Being 32 (EORTC QLQ-SWB32) in older adults with chronic illnesses: Factors influencing spiri

Chia-Hsuan Chiang, Ru-Yih Chen, Shuh‐Jen Sheu, Kuang-Chieh Hsueh et al.
Journal of Health Psychology
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
article

Translation and validation of the Traditional Chinese European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Spiritual Well-Being 32 (EORTC QLQ-SWB32) in older adults with chronic illnesses: Factors influencing spiri

Chia-Hsuan Chiang, Ru-Yih Chen, Shuh‐Jen Sheu, Kuang-Chieh Hsueh, Chen Ping-Jen, Feng-Yun Wang, Bella Vivat
article en

Abstract

This study translated and validated the Traditional Chinese (Taiwan) version of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Spiritual Well-Being 32 (EORTC QLQ-SWB32) for older adults with chronic illnesses and examined factors influencing SWB. A cross-sectional study recruited 292 participants. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (overall Cronbach's α = 0.87), with subdomain Cronbach's α ranging from 0.77 to 0.87, and acceptable test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.76). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses confirmed consistency of the domain structure with the original version, supporting its construct validity. Multiple regression analyses showed that demographic characteristics, chronic disease status, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) significantly influenced SWB (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 21.6%-41.0%), with the Existential domain most affected. Religious belief, higher education levels, and employment-based income may be potential independent protective factors for SWB, whereas stroke, anxiety/depression, and pain/discomfort may be potential risk factors.

Journal of Health Psychology
National Sun Yat-sen University (TW), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Kaohsiung Medical University (TW), National Health Research Institutes (TW), Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (TW), University College London (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.