Influence of Quantitative Variables on Residency Match: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Introduction The residency match process entails a comprehensive evaluation of each medical student applicant, and multiple aspects of the application affect a student's competitiveness for their chosen specialty. Quantitative variables associated with the match application were selected for analysis, as they are the most objective and consistently reported metrics. This study aims to identify the quantitative variables that are most strongly correlated with determining residency match probability. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study conducted between 2013 and 2021, utilizing data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Report on Residents. Possible predictors of matching, including average United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 scores, number of research experiences, number of research abstracts, presentations, and publications, number of volunteer experiences, and number of work experiences, were analyzed over time for each Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited specialty using percent variation. Radar plots were created to determine the most influential categories in determining the probability of matching for each specialty. Results Overall, research abstracts, presentations, and publications had the highest association with an applicant's probability of matching into their selected specialty. Standardized test scores were most positively associated with successful matches into Otolaryngology, Orthopedic Surgery, Plastic Surgery, and Neurological Surgery, with high Z scores (1.69, 1.68, 1.62, and 1.52, respectively, for Step 1). Conclusion A thorough analysis of the available objective data suggests that scholarly activities, including research abstracts, presentations, and publications, are the single most important quantitative variable influencing a student's likelihood of matching. Future research can explore understanding the essential role of qualitative variables, such as letters of recommendation and personal statements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.100385
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Quantitative Variables on Residency Match: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Eldo E. Frezza, Bhagvat Maheta, Pomi Yun, Caroline Goswami et al.
Cureus
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Influence of Quantitative Variables on Residency Match: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Eldo E. Frezza, Bhagvat Maheta, Pomi Yun, Caroline Goswami, Jimmy Wen, Jose L Puglisi, Muhammad Karabala, Megan D Hsu, Ashley Niu, Ramy Khalil
article en

Abstract

Introduction The residency match process entails a comprehensive evaluation of each medical student applicant, and multiple aspects of the application affect a student's competitiveness for their chosen specialty. Quantitative variables associated with the match application were selected for analysis, as they are the most objective and consistently reported metrics. This study aims to identify the quantitative variables that are most strongly correlated with determining residency match probability. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study conducted between 2013 and 2021, utilizing data from the Association of American Medical Colleges Report on Residents. Possible predictors of matching, including average United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 scores, number of research experiences, number of research abstracts, presentations, and publications, number of volunteer experiences, and number of work experiences, were analyzed over time for each Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited specialty using percent variation. Radar plots were created to determine the most influential categories in determining the probability of matching for each specialty. Results Overall, research abstracts, presentations, and publications had the highest association with an applicant's probability of matching into their selected specialty. Standardized test scores were most positively associated with successful matches into Otolaryngology, Orthopedic Surgery, Plastic Surgery, and Neurological Surgery, with high Z scores (1.69, 1.68, 1.62, and 1.52, respectively, for Step 1). Conclusion A thorough analysis of the available objective data suggests that scholarly activities, including research abstracts, presentations, and publications, are the single most important quantitative variable influencing a student's likelihood of matching. Future research can explore understanding the essential role of qualitative variables, such as letters of recommendation and personal statements.

CureusVol. 17(12)
Northwestern University (US), California Pacific Medical Center (US), California Northstate University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.