Regulation of digital social networks, political propaganda and opposition discourse: a case study into the tension between Elon Musk and the Brazilian Judiciary

This article analyzes the political discourse surrounding the conflict between Elon Musk and the Brazilian Judiciary, particularly Minister Alexandre de Moraes, in the context of digital social network regulation. Its objective is to understand how polarized narratives are constructed and disseminated in a post-truth era marked by disinformation and ideological antagonism. Grounded in discourse analysis, the study justifies its relevance by the growing use of digital platforms for political influence and the absence of specific regulation in Brazil. The results reveal how both sides employ generalizations, emotional appeals, and ambiguity to legitimize their positions, turning social networks into arenas of political propaganda rather than democratic dialogue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revue internationale animation territoires et pratiques socioculturelles
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55765/atps.i28.3649
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulation of digital social networks, political propaganda and opposition discourse: a case study into the tension between Elon Musk and the Brazilian Judiciary

Duílio Fabbri Júnior
Revue internationale animation territoires et pratiques socioculturelles
Social Media and Politics
article

Regulation of digital social networks, political propaganda and opposition discourse: a case study into the tension between Elon Musk and the Brazilian Judiciary

Duílio Fabbri Júnior
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the political discourse surrounding the conflict between Elon Musk and the Brazilian Judiciary, particularly Minister Alexandre de Moraes, in the context of digital social network regulation. Its objective is to understand how polarized narratives are constructed and disseminated in a post-truth era marked by disinformation and ideological antagonism. Grounded in discourse analysis, the study justifies its relevance by the growing use of digital platforms for political influence and the absence of specific regulation in Brazil. The results reveal how both sides employ generalizations, emotional appeals, and ambiguity to legitimize their positions, turning social networks into arenas of political propaganda rather than democratic dialogue.

Revue internationale animation territoires et pratiques socioculturelles(28)
Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regulation of digital social networks, political propaganda and opposition discourse: a case study into the tension between Elon Musk and the Brazilian Judiciary — Duílio Fabbri Júnior · Revue internationale animation territoires et pratiques socioculturelles (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS