Serendipity, support and equity: a qualitative study examining career initiation in medical education

Medical education is becoming a more structured and recognized field of medicine. Beyond working at an academic medical center or doing occasional didactic or clinical teaching, some physicians dedicate significant time and effort to becoming medical educators. Little is known about the ways in which these physicians enter the field of medical education. This qualitative study utilized purposeful sampling to identify medical educators from different institutions and geographical areas, categorized by gender and career stage. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data related specifically to participants’ initial interest in medical education and foundational work in this area were identified and evaluated. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop themes across items and participants. Twenty-two medical educators (11 male, 11 female) were interviewed. The average age of the participants was 51 (range: 31–72). Time from completion of training averaged 18 years (range: <1–41 years). Their paths to medical education were evaluated as part of a larger study examining the motivations of medical educators. The participants described varied ways of entering the field of medical education: by chance, through the influence and direction of others, or via self-advocacy. Physicians become medical educators along different pathways, and their stories reflect varied perspectives and interpretations of career influences. Informal channels provide opportunities for some. However, offering positions to known contacts severely limits the number of potential applicants. This process may hinder efforts to create a diverse workforce in medical education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08014-9
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serendipity, support and equity: a qualitative study examining career initiation in medical education

Jessica Gold, Jennifer C. Kesselheim, Cynthia J. Stein, Richard M. Schwartzstein et al.
BMC Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Serendipity, support and equity: a qualitative study examining career initiation in medical education

Jessica Gold, Jennifer C. Kesselheim, Cynthia J. Stein, Richard M. Schwartzstein, Donna Luff
article en

Abstract

Medical education is becoming a more structured and recognized field of medicine. Beyond working at an academic medical center or doing occasional didactic or clinical teaching, some physicians dedicate significant time and effort to becoming medical educators. Little is known about the ways in which these physicians enter the field of medical education. This qualitative study utilized purposeful sampling to identify medical educators from different institutions and geographical areas, categorized by gender and career stage. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data related specifically to participants’ initial interest in medical education and foundational work in this area were identified and evaluated. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop themes across items and participants. Twenty-two medical educators (11 male, 11 female) were interviewed. The average age of the participants was 51 (range: 31–72). Time from completion of training averaged 18 years (range: <1–41 years). Their paths to medical education were evaluated as part of a larger study examining the motivations of medical educators. The participants described varied ways of entering the field of medical education: by chance, through the influence and direction of others, or via self-advocacy. Physicians become medical educators along different pathways, and their stories reflect varied perspectives and interpretations of career influences. Informal channels provide opportunities for some. However, offering positions to known contacts severely limits the number of potential applicants. This process may hinder efforts to create a diverse workforce in medical education.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 25(1)
Boston Children's Hospital (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Boston Children's Museum (US), Harvard Stem Cell Institute (US), Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.