The «gull sign» in acetabular fractures revisited: is it predictive for failure after osteosynthesis in older adults?

Background The gull sign was described as a radiographic marker of superomedial dome impaction in acetabular fractures and was considered predictive of failure after osteosynthesis in older patients (≥ 60 years).Aim To determine whether the radiographic gull sign is associated with higher conversion rates to total hip arthroplasty (THA) within 24 months after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for displaced acetabular fractures in patients aged ≥ 60 years.Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 126 patients aged ≥ 60 years (mean 76 years, range 60.1-93.6) underwent ORIF for displaced acetabular fractures via the Pararectus approach between 2009 and 2020. Preoperative pelvic radiographs were assessed for the presence of the gull sign, and CT scans were evaluated for dome impaction. Failure was defined as conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) within 24 months after ORIF. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests were performed on the entire cohort, and diagnostic performance was analysed in the subset with complete two-year follow-up (n = 93).Results At two years, 20 of 93 patients (22 %) had undergone THA, occurring on average 12.1 months after the index surgery (range 2-45 months). A radiographic gull sign was identified in 21 patients (23 %). The subsequent THA conversion rate was similar between those with and without the sign (5/21 [24 %] vs 15/72 [21 %]; p = 0.99). Concordance between radiographs and CT was limited: only 12 of 21 gull-positive patients (57 %) showed a true dome impaction on CT, while CT nevertheless revealed impaction in 21 of 72 gull-negative patients (29 %). Among patients with CT-confirmed impaction, 8 of 33 (24 %) underwent THA within 24 months, compared with 12 of 60 (20 %) without impaction (p = 0.79). Kaplan-Meier analysis of the entire cohort (n = 126) likewise showed no difference in THA-free survival between groups.Conclusion Neither a radiographic gull sign nor CT-confirmed dome impaction predicted early conversion in our series of acetabular fractures managed via Pararectus approach; overall conversion rates were acceptable. Accordingly, the gull sign is not a harbinger per se for failure of osteosynthesis in older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/93420
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The «gull sign» in acetabular fractures revisited: is it predictive for failure after osteosynthesis in older adults?

Johannes Bastian, Rainer J. Egli, Marius J. B. Keel, Silviya Ivanova et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

The «gull sign» in acetabular fractures revisited: is it predictive for failure after osteosynthesis in older adults?

Johannes Bastian, Rainer J. Egli, Marius J. B. Keel, Silviya Ivanova, Andromachi Chantzara
article en

Abstract

Background The gull sign was described as a radiographic marker of superomedial dome impaction in acetabular fractures and was considered predictive of failure after osteosynthesis in older patients (≥ 60 years).Aim To determine whether the radiographic gull sign is associated with higher conversion rates to total hip arthroplasty (THA) within 24 months after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for displaced acetabular fractures in patients aged ≥ 60 years.Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 126 patients aged ≥ 60 years (mean 76 years, range 60.1-93.6) underwent ORIF for displaced acetabular fractures via the Pararectus approach between 2009 and 2020. Preoperative pelvic radiographs were assessed for the presence of the gull sign, and CT scans were evaluated for dome impaction. Failure was defined as conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) within 24 months after ORIF. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests were performed on the entire cohort, and diagnostic performance was analysed in the subset with complete two-year follow-up (n = 93).Results At two years, 20 of 93 patients (22 %) had undergone THA, occurring on average 12.1 months after the index surgery (range 2-45 months). A radiographic gull sign was identified in 21 patients (23 %). The subsequent THA conversion rate was similar between those with and without the sign (5/21 [24 %] vs 15/72 [21 %]; p = 0.99). Concordance between radiographs and CT was limited: only 12 of 21 gull-positive patients (57 %) showed a true dome impaction on CT, while CT nevertheless revealed impaction in 21 of 72 gull-negative patients (29 %). Among patients with CT-confirmed impaction, 8 of 33 (24 %) underwent THA within 24 months, compared with 12 of 60 (20 %) without impaction (p = 0.79). Kaplan-Meier analysis of the entire cohort (n = 126) likewise showed no difference in THA-free survival between groups.Conclusion Neither a radiographic gull sign nor CT-confirmed dome impaction predicted early conversion in our series of acetabular fractures managed via Pararectus approach; overall conversion rates were acceptable. Accordingly, the gull sign is not a harbinger per se for failure of osteosynthesis in older adults.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Society of Interventional Radiology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.