Assessing Patient Experiences and Priorities in Traumatic Brain Injury Health Care: A Survey Study

Improving patient experiences and outcomes of traumatic brain injury (TBI) will require understanding patient perspectives of current care systems. Experts have called for building more integrated, patient-centered systems of care to better support patients through stages of TBI recovery. Informed by an earlier qualitative study, we conducted a survey to quantify patient perspectives on discharge and post-discharge experiences across seven hospitals in a single southeastern Wisconsin health system. Eligible participants were English or Spanish speakers and received TBI care between February 2023 and June 2024 at one level I trauma center emergency department (ED) and inpatient unit, two level III trauma center EDs, or four freestanding (non-hospital-based) EDs. Of N = 1,085 patients invited, 321 responded to questions about awareness of TBI diagnosis, discharge instructions, post-discharge treatment experiences, and gaps in follow-up care. Fifty percent of respondents were male, with a median age of 44 years, and 94% were English speakers. Weighted results indicated that 35% of participants were unaware of their TBI diagnosis, 39% desired more follow-up care, and 50% reported still experiencing injury-related symptoms at the time of the survey (Median 94 days [interquartile range 53, 149]). Sociodemographic factors were also associated with some study outcomes: Individuals who were Spanish-speaking reported lower awareness of their TBI diagnosis compared with English speakers (9% vs. 67%, p = 0.001). Additionally, individuals in the highest quartile of neighborhood disadvantage were more likely to desire follow-up care (66%) compared to those in lower disadvantage quartiles (26%–31%; p > 0.001). Moreover, survey outcomes were associated in important ways. For instance, the receipt of a TBI-related handout at discharge was associated with greater awareness of TBI diagnosis ( p = 0.003) and better understanding of home care instructions ( p < 0.001). Our findings emphasize the urgent need to strengthen follow-up pathways and deliver more patient-centered care that prioritizes effective patient–provider communication, particularly around diagnosis and the provision of TBI discharge education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurotrauma Reports
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2689288x251404403
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Patient Experiences and Priorities in Traumatic Brain Injury Health Care: A Survey Study

Lindsay D. Nelson, Terri DeRoon-Cassini, Staci Young, Courtney Barry et al.
Neurotrauma Reports
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Assessing Patient Experiences and Priorities in Traumatic Brain Injury Health Care: A Survey Study

Lindsay D. Nelson, Terri DeRoon-Cassini, Staci Young, Courtney Barry, Sergey Tarima, Temitayo Rebecca Okusanya, Kathleen Williams, Yuka Kobayashi, Michael A. McCrea, Madeline D. Furie
article en

Abstract

Improving patient experiences and outcomes of traumatic brain injury (TBI) will require understanding patient perspectives of current care systems. Experts have called for building more integrated, patient-centered systems of care to better support patients through stages of TBI recovery. Informed by an earlier qualitative study, we conducted a survey to quantify patient perspectives on discharge and post-discharge experiences across seven hospitals in a single southeastern Wisconsin health system. Eligible participants were English or Spanish speakers and received TBI care between February 2023 and June 2024 at one level I trauma center emergency department (ED) and inpatient unit, two level III trauma center EDs, or four freestanding (non-hospital-based) EDs. Of N = 1,085 patients invited, 321 responded to questions about awareness of TBI diagnosis, discharge instructions, post-discharge treatment experiences, and gaps in follow-up care. Fifty percent of respondents were male, with a median age of 44 years, and 94% were English speakers. Weighted results indicated that 35% of participants were unaware of their TBI diagnosis, 39% desired more follow-up care, and 50% reported still experiencing injury-related symptoms at the time of the survey (Median 94 days [interquartile range 53, 149]). Sociodemographic factors were also associated with some study outcomes: Individuals who were Spanish-speaking reported lower awareness of their TBI diagnosis compared with English speakers (9% vs. 67%, p = 0.001). Additionally, individuals in the highest quartile of neighborhood disadvantage were more likely to desire follow-up care (66%) compared to those in lower disadvantage quartiles (26%–31%; p > 0.001). Moreover, survey outcomes were associated in important ways. For instance, the receipt of a TBI-related handout at discharge was associated with greater awareness of TBI diagnosis ( p = 0.003) and better understanding of home care instructions ( p < 0.001). Our findings emphasize the urgent need to strengthen follow-up pathways and deliver more patient-centered care that prioritizes effective patient–provider communication, particularly around diagnosis and the provision of TBI discharge education.

Neurotrauma ReportsVol. 7
University of Kentucky (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.