Video-enhanced training for entrustable professional activities in preclinical oral surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Traditional preclinical teaching methods face challenges in adequately preparing oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) students for the entrustable professional activities (EPA) required in their future clinical internships. This study aimed to evaluate how a 4 K live-video teaching model (LTM), integrated into a preclinical transitional course (PTC), improves students’ EPA-related performance. Thirty-six fifth-year undergraduate students participated in a PTC. They were randomly divided into two groups. The control group was taught using a traditional teaching model within the PTC (direct guidance at a manikin), while the experimental group received instruction supplemented with the LTM. The module incorporated high-fidelity simulation, wherein a physician acted as a simulated patient to provide real-time verbal feedback. After the PTC, students’ competencies were comprehensively evaluated across several domains: comprehensive EPA scores (self-assessed, teacher-rated, and composite), procedural skills assessment scores, theoretical examination scores, and questionnaire-based self-evaluations and teacher evaluations of student outcomes. All assessment instruments were found to be reliable, as indicated by their ICC and Cronbach’s α values. The assessment instruments showed high validity. Compared to the control group, the experimental group achieved significantly higher scores in EPA self-assessment (93.05 ± 1.26 vs. 89.21 ± 1.26), teacher evaluation (88.79 ± 0.85 vs. 85.86 ± 0.85), and overall EPA performance (90.92 ± 0.91 vs. 87.54 ± 0.91) (all p < 0.05). The experimental group also demonstrated superior procedural skill test scores (89.49 ± 0.73 vs. 79.48 ± 0.73, p < 0.001), self-evaluations of learning (21.61 ± 1.14 vs. 13.05 ± 1.70, p < 0.001), and teacher evaluations of their performance (21.37 ± 1.23 vs. 18.93 ± 1.31, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in theoretical examination scores (p > 0.05). In this study, the integration of LTM into the OMFS PTC was associated with a significant enhancement in students’ foundational procedural skills, self-perceived competence, and overall performance as evaluated by faculty. These findings suggest that this teaching model can be an effective tool for improving EPA-related performance in a preclinical setting. However, given the single-center design and small sample size, further research is warranted to validate these results. This model shows potential for better preparing students for the clinical entrustment process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08368-0
Primary Topic
Dental Research and COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Video-enhanced training for entrustable professional activities in preclinical oral surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Jiafen Zhang, Xiaosong Wei, Tinglin Yan, Zhe Wen et al.
BMC Medical Education
Dental Research and COVID-19
article

Video-enhanced training for entrustable professional activities in preclinical oral surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Jiafen Zhang, Xiaosong Wei, Tinglin Yan, Zhe Wen, Yuqi Li, Yue Lin, Zhexuan Bao
article en

Abstract

Traditional preclinical teaching methods face challenges in adequately preparing oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) students for the entrustable professional activities (EPA) required in their future clinical internships. This study aimed to evaluate how a 4 K live-video teaching model (LTM), integrated into a preclinical transitional course (PTC), improves students’ EPA-related performance. Thirty-six fifth-year undergraduate students participated in a PTC. They were randomly divided into two groups. The control group was taught using a traditional teaching model within the PTC (direct guidance at a manikin), while the experimental group received instruction supplemented with the LTM. The module incorporated high-fidelity simulation, wherein a physician acted as a simulated patient to provide real-time verbal feedback. After the PTC, students’ competencies were comprehensively evaluated across several domains: comprehensive EPA scores (self-assessed, teacher-rated, and composite), procedural skills assessment scores, theoretical examination scores, and questionnaire-based self-evaluations and teacher evaluations of student outcomes. All assessment instruments were found to be reliable, as indicated by their ICC and Cronbach’s α values. The assessment instruments showed high validity. Compared to the control group, the experimental group achieved significantly higher scores in EPA self-assessment (93.05 ± 1.26 vs. 89.21 ± 1.26), teacher evaluation (88.79 ± 0.85 vs. 85.86 ± 0.85), and overall EPA performance (90.92 ± 0.91 vs. 87.54 ± 0.91) (all p < 0.05). The experimental group also demonstrated superior procedural skill test scores (89.49 ± 0.73 vs. 79.48 ± 0.73, p < 0.001), self-evaluations of learning (21.61 ± 1.14 vs. 13.05 ± 1.70, p < 0.001), and teacher evaluations of their performance (21.37 ± 1.23 vs. 18.93 ± 1.31, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in theoretical examination scores (p > 0.05). In this study, the integration of LTM into the OMFS PTC was associated with a significant enhancement in students’ foundational procedural skills, self-perceived competence, and overall performance as evaluated by faculty. These findings suggest that this teaching model can be an effective tool for improving EPA-related performance in a preclinical setting. However, given the single-center design and small sample size, further research is warranted to validate these results. This model shows potential for better preparing students for the clinical entrustment process.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Yonsei University (KR), Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (CN), Stomatology Hospital (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Dental Research and COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.