Mapping the circular economy: Insights from 2,701 indicators

The circular economy (CE) is widely seen as a path to sustainability, yet it remains unclear whether its indicators fully reflect its overall contribution. Despite rapid growth, current classifications of CE indicators remain fragmented and are often based on limited datasets. To address this, this study maps 2701 CE indicators to provide a comprehensive overview of their thematic and structural distribution. A six-domain framework was applied (covering environmental, economic, social, circularity, technological, and legislative dimensions) and organized into 21 classes and 118 subgroups. To address inconsistencies, a hybrid labeling approach was introduced for classifying data types and economic levels. Results show that CE indicators collectively span all sustainability domains but remain unevenly distributed, with quantitative and meso-level indicators prevailing and micro-level ones underrepresented. Three key insights emerge: (1) large datasets reduce bias in CE assessment; (2) multi-level classification enables clearer interpretation; and (3) binary labeling oversimplifies contextual complexity. Overall, this mapping demonstrates that CE measurement has expanded beyond traditional circularity metrics toward broader sustainability integration, providing a foundation for more coherent indicator development and policy alignment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100392
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the circular economy: Insights from 2,701 indicators

Zahir Barahmand, Marianne S. Eikeland, Liang Wang
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Mapping the circular economy: Insights from 2,701 indicators

Zahir Barahmand, Marianne S. Eikeland, Liang Wang
article en

Abstract

The circular economy (CE) is widely seen as a path to sustainability, yet it remains unclear whether its indicators fully reflect its overall contribution. Despite rapid growth, current classifications of CE indicators remain fragmented and are often based on limited datasets. To address this, this study maps 2701 CE indicators to provide a comprehensive overview of their thematic and structural distribution. A six-domain framework was applied (covering environmental, economic, social, circularity, technological, and legislative dimensions) and organized into 21 classes and 118 subgroups. To address inconsistencies, a hybrid labeling approach was introduced for classifying data types and economic levels. Results show that CE indicators collectively span all sustainability domains but remain unevenly distributed, with quantitative and meso-level indicators prevailing and micro-level ones underrepresented. Three key insights emerge: (1) large datasets reduce bias in CE assessment; (2) multi-level classification enables clearer interpretation; and (3) binary labeling oversimplifies contextual complexity. Overall, this mapping demonstrates that CE measurement has expanded beyond traditional circularity metrics toward broader sustainability integration, providing a foundation for more coherent indicator development and policy alignment.

Cleaner Environmental SystemsVol. 20
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.