Booster session prescription and outcomes in adults with chronic low back pain: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundBooster sessions are suggested to maintain self-management behaviors and treatment effects in chronic low back pain (LBP) interventions, but the effects of boosters on outcomes and the best parameters for booster prescription are unclear.Objectives(1) Compare booster prescription for two LBP treatments in an RCT where prescription was based on self-management program independence, (2) Determine if participant-specific variables predict requiring additional boosters, (3) Explore effects of boosters on outcomes in those requiring additional boosters.MethodsSecondary analysis of an RCT where 154 participants with LBP were randomized to motor skill training (MST), MST + Boosters (MST + B), strength/flexibility exercise (SFE), or SFE + B. This analysis focuses only on the + Boosters groups (age: 40.1 ± 11.2 years, 49 female, LBP duration 9.8 ± 8.8 years). Participants received MST or SFE and six months later received up to 3 boosters. Self-management program independence was assessed at the first booster, and those who were not independent required additional (>1) boosters. Chi-square tests were used to analyze booster prescription. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine predictors of requiring additional boosters. Descriptive statistics were calculated for outcomes for participants who did and did not require additional boosters.ResultsMST + B and SFE + B did not significantly differ in returning for the first booster, χ<sup>2</sup>(1) = 1.76, <i>p</i> = 0.185. SFE + B were over 10 times more likely to require additional boosters than MST + B; OR = 10.9, 95% CI = [3.1, 38.1]. No participant-specific factors were statistically related to needing additional boosters. Attending additional boosters did not appear to change pain or function.ConclusionsIntervention type, not participant-specific factors, predicted the need for additional boosters. Attending additional boosters did not appear to change pain or function in the current sample.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251407665
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Booster session prescription and outcomes in adults with chronic low back pain: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Quenten L. Hooker, Vanessa M. Lanier, Jesse M. Civello, Keith R Lohse et al.
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Booster session prescription and outcomes in adults with chronic low back pain: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Quenten L. Hooker, Vanessa M. Lanier, Jesse M. Civello, Keith R Lohse, Linda R van Dillen
article en

Abstract

BackgroundBooster sessions are suggested to maintain self-management behaviors and treatment effects in chronic low back pain (LBP) interventions, but the effects of boosters on outcomes and the best parameters for booster prescription are unclear.Objectives(1) Compare booster prescription for two LBP treatments in an RCT where prescription was based on self-management program independence, (2) Determine if participant-specific variables predict requiring additional boosters, (3) Explore effects of boosters on outcomes in those requiring additional boosters.MethodsSecondary analysis of an RCT where 154 participants with LBP were randomized to motor skill training (MST), MST + Boosters (MST + B), strength/flexibility exercise (SFE), or SFE + B. This analysis focuses only on the + Boosters groups (age: 40.1 ± 11.2 years, 49 female, LBP duration 9.8 ± 8.8 years). Participants received MST or SFE and six months later received up to 3 boosters. Self-management program independence was assessed at the first booster, and those who were not independent required additional (>1) boosters. Chi-square tests were used to analyze booster prescription. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine predictors of requiring additional boosters. Descriptive statistics were calculated for outcomes for participants who did and did not require additional boosters.ResultsMST + B and SFE + B did not significantly differ in returning for the first booster, χ<sup>2</sup>(1) = 1.76, <i>p</i> = 0.185. SFE + B were over 10 times more likely to require additional boosters than MST + B; OR = 10.9, 95% CI = [3.1, 38.1]. No participant-specific factors were statistically related to needing additional boosters. Attending additional boosters did not appear to change pain or function.ConclusionsIntervention type, not participant-specific factors, predicted the need for additional boosters. Attending additional boosters did not appear to change pain or function in the current sample.

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.