The influence of positioning error on the intensity of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced cortical electric field: Mathematical models constructed from 55 776 electric field simulations of 28 commercial TMS coils

The clinical efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) critically depends on precise coil positioning; yet, a systematic quantitative analysis of how positioning errors affect the TMS-induced cortical electric field (E-field) intensity remains unavailable. To address this gap, this study developed mathematical models for 28 commercial TMS coils to characterize the impact of six-degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) positioning errors—including translational (X, Y, Z) and rotational (yaw, pitch, roll) components—on cortical E-field intensity. These models were constructed using 55 776 E-field simulations of the primary motor cortex (M1) across 24 healthy adult subjects, enabling the quantification of translational and rotational positioning error sensitivity across coils and the development of a rapid cortical electric field evaluation method (FIEM) for rapid E-field evaluation. Key results demonstrate high accuracy in predicting positioning error effects (R > 0.94 for all 28 coils), significantly broader sensitivity ranges for translational compared to rotational errors, and FIEM achieving 95% accuracy with a 14 ms computational speed. By incorporating cross-vendor, multi-size coil comparisons, our results provide clinicians and researchers with data-driven tools for selecting TMS coils and positioning approaches, while the FIEM framework supports rapid E-field evaluation to reduce uncertainty in cortical targeting during TMS interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIP Advances
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0289867
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of positioning error on the intensity of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced cortical electric field: Mathematical models constructed from 55 776 electric field simulations of 28 commercial TMS coils

J L Jin, Tao Yin, Zhang Li, He Wang et al.
AIP Advances
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

The influence of positioning error on the intensity of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced cortical electric field: Mathematical models constructed from 55 776 electric field simulations of 28 commercial TMS coils

J L Jin, Tao Yin, Zhang Li, He Wang, Ying Li, Yuhui Zhao, Xin Wang
article en

Abstract

The clinical efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) critically depends on precise coil positioning; yet, a systematic quantitative analysis of how positioning errors affect the TMS-induced cortical electric field (E-field) intensity remains unavailable. To address this gap, this study developed mathematical models for 28 commercial TMS coils to characterize the impact of six-degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) positioning errors—including translational (X, Y, Z) and rotational (yaw, pitch, roll) components—on cortical E-field intensity. These models were constructed using 55 776 E-field simulations of the primary motor cortex (M1) across 24 healthy adult subjects, enabling the quantification of translational and rotational positioning error sensitivity across coils and the development of a rapid cortical electric field evaluation method (FIEM) for rapid E-field evaluation. Key results demonstrate high accuracy in predicting positioning error effects (R > 0.94 for all 28 coils), significantly broader sensitivity ranges for translational compared to rotational errors, and FIEM achieving 95% accuracy with a 14 ms computational speed. By incorporating cross-vendor, multi-size coil comparisons, our results provide clinicians and researchers with data-driven tools for selecting TMS coils and positioning approaches, while the FIEM framework supports rapid E-field evaluation to reduce uncertainty in cortical targeting during TMS interventions.

AIP AdvancesVol. 15(12)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.