Representing nations as ‘things’: Media, nationhood and entitativity

This article offers two key contributions. First, it provides a novel approach to theorising the relationship between media and nationalism by drawing on the concept of entitativity to explore the ways in which mainstream media represent individual nations as ‘entities’ operating in a largely taken-for-granted inter national system. In doing so, it also addresses a largely overlooked question within the wider psychological literature on entitativity; how it might be possible to view the largest, most complex and, sometimes, divided social groups as entities. The second part of the article seeks to provide evidence to support these arguments by drawing on two data sets. The first involves a systematic content analysis of everyday media reporting during an ‘ordinary’ period. The second provides an overview of coverage of a major media event. Interestingly, while the relevance of two existing category groups, character and dynamic, is noted in relation to the major event, a new ‘discursive’ category is introduced to capture the manifold ways in which language and symbols are routinely used to represent nations as entities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Communication
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231251409689
Primary Topic
Social Representations and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representing nations as ‘things’: Media, nationhood and entitativity

Michael Skey
European Journal of Communication
Social Representations and Identity
article

Representing nations as ‘things’: Media, nationhood and entitativity

Michael Skey
article en

Abstract

This article offers two key contributions. First, it provides a novel approach to theorising the relationship between media and nationalism by drawing on the concept of entitativity to explore the ways in which mainstream media represent individual nations as ‘entities’ operating in a largely taken-for-granted inter national system. In doing so, it also addresses a largely overlooked question within the wider psychological literature on entitativity; how it might be possible to view the largest, most complex and, sometimes, divided social groups as entities. The second part of the article seeks to provide evidence to support these arguments by drawing on two data sets. The first involves a systematic content analysis of everyday media reporting during an ‘ordinary’ period. The second provides an overview of coverage of a major media event. Interestingly, while the relevance of two existing category groups, character and dynamic, is noted in relation to the major event, a new ‘discursive’ category is introduced to capture the manifold ways in which language and symbols are routinely used to represent nations as entities.

European Journal of CommunicationVol. 41(1)
Loughborough University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Social Representations and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.