Data-Dependent Weighted E-Value Aggregation for Fusion Learning

We propose a data-dependent weighted e-value aggregation framework for synthesizing discoveries across partially overlapping studies. The key idea is to convert within study p-value-based multiple testing results into e-values and aggregate them using data-dependent leave-one-out weights, thereby mitigating the power loss associated with naive averaging. We show that applying the e-Benjamini–Hochberg procedure to the aggregated e-values yields finite-sample control of the global false discovery rate under standard conditions. Simulation studies and real-data analyses demonstrate the effectiveness and practical advantages of the proposed methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14010088
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-Dependent Weighted E-Value Aggregation for Fusion Learning

G. H. Li, Jiahang Gao, Hongyu Chen
Mathematics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Data-Dependent Weighted E-Value Aggregation for Fusion Learning

G. H. Li, Jiahang Gao, Hongyu Chen
article en

Abstract

We propose a data-dependent weighted e-value aggregation framework for synthesizing discoveries across partially overlapping studies. The key idea is to convert within study p-value-based multiple testing results into e-values and aggregate them using data-dependent leave-one-out weights, thereby mitigating the power loss associated with naive averaging. We show that applying the e-Benjamini–Hochberg procedure to the aggregated e-values yields finite-sample control of the global false discovery rate under standard conditions. Simulation studies and real-data analyses demonstrate the effectiveness and practical advantages of the proposed methods.

MathematicsVol. 14(1)
Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University (CN), Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Beijing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.