241 The Role of Staging Laparoscopy in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Comprehensive Analysis

Abstract Background Staging laparoscopy is an established tool for detecting occult peritoneal metastases in upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers. Its utility is well supported in gastric cancer; however, evidence for its role in oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancers is limited and largely predates the PET/CT era. Current guidelines vary in their recommendations. This study evaluates the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of staging laparoscopy across UGI cancer subtypes. Method A retrospective analysis was performed on 490 patients undergoing staging laparoscopy. After exclusions, 375 patients were included: oesophageal (n=136), GOJ (n=133), and gastric (n=106). The primary outcome was the incidence of positive peritoneal cytology by cancer subtype. Secondary outcomes included changes in treatment intent and procedural costs. Results Positive cytology was identified in 6.5% (24/369) overall: 12.0% in gastric, 6% in GOJ, and 2.9% in oesophageal cancers. Macroscopic peritoneal disease was seen in 10.5% (39/372), most commonly in gastric cancer. Staging laparoscopy influenced management in 13.6% (51/375), predominantly in gastric and GOJ S2/S3 cancers. The procedure had minimal impact in oesophageal cancer. It was well tolerated, with a median hospital stay of 1 day and mean cost of £2,373 (n=137). Conclusions Staging laparoscopy provides meaningful diagnostic and clinical value in gastric and select GOJ cancers, altering treatment in nearly 14% of cases. In contrast, its role in oesophageal cancer appears limited and of lower diagnostic utility, and minimal influence on management. A risk-adapted approach focusing on high-risk gastric and GOJ cases, while expediting time to treatment, and minimising healthcare costs for patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.178
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

241 The Role of Staging Laparoscopy in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Comprehensive Analysis

Ashraf Tokhi, E. Emmet Reid, Simone Clarke, Simon L. Parsons et al.
British journal of surgery
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

241 The Role of Staging Laparoscopy in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Comprehensive Analysis

Ashraf Tokhi, E. Emmet Reid, Simone Clarke, Simon L. Parsons, Sam North, Isabel Pereira, Madiyyah Khan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Staging laparoscopy is an established tool for detecting occult peritoneal metastases in upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers. Its utility is well supported in gastric cancer; however, evidence for its role in oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancers is limited and largely predates the PET/CT era. Current guidelines vary in their recommendations. This study evaluates the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of staging laparoscopy across UGI cancer subtypes. Method A retrospective analysis was performed on 490 patients undergoing staging laparoscopy. After exclusions, 375 patients were included: oesophageal (n=136), GOJ (n=133), and gastric (n=106). The primary outcome was the incidence of positive peritoneal cytology by cancer subtype. Secondary outcomes included changes in treatment intent and procedural costs. Results Positive cytology was identified in 6.5% (24/369) overall: 12.0% in gastric, 6% in GOJ, and 2.9% in oesophageal cancers. Macroscopic peritoneal disease was seen in 10.5% (39/372), most commonly in gastric cancer. Staging laparoscopy influenced management in 13.6% (51/375), predominantly in gastric and GOJ S2/S3 cancers. The procedure had minimal impact in oesophageal cancer. It was well tolerated, with a median hospital stay of 1 day and mean cost of £2,373 (n=137). Conclusions Staging laparoscopy provides meaningful diagnostic and clinical value in gastric and select GOJ cancers, altering treatment in nearly 14% of cases. In contrast, its role in oesophageal cancer appears limited and of lower diagnostic utility, and minimal influence on management. A risk-adapted approach focusing on high-risk gastric and GOJ cases, while expediting time to treatment, and minimising healthcare costs for patients with oesophageal cancer.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.