Endoscopic Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Decompression of Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technique and Outcome

BACKGROUND: Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) was adopted instead of traditional expanding laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) approach in patients with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis.METHODS: This is a retrospective clinical and radiological study of 42 patients treated with endoscopic ULBD for multilevel LSS at our center. The perioperative results were evaluated, including blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complications within one month postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed. A functional evaluation was conducted using Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire. Low back and leg pain were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at follow-up visits using visual analog scale (VAS). Macnab’s criteria were applied at the last postoperative follow-up for clinical efficacy evaluation.RESULTS: The mean operative time was 119.6±13.7 minutes. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 76.4±19.1mL. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.7 days. Operation-related complications were identified in two (4.8%) of the 42 patients. The VAS scores at postoperative 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up (back VAS: 1.8±0.67, 1.72±0.63, 1.54±0.67 respectively; leg VAS: 2.9±1.47, 2.18±1.22, 1.68±0.72 respectively) were significantly better than the preoperative ones (back VAS: 2.9±1.04; leg VAS: 6.45±1.14). Similarly, the ODI score at postoperative 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up (21.95±4.78, 17.22±4.09, 13.31±2.07 respectively) were significantly better than the preoperative one (43.54 ± 11.75). Macnab’s criteria revealed satisfactory subjective outcomes (good to excellent results) in 39 patients (92.9%) at the final follow-up.CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ULBD in multiple LSS relieves pain and improves patient’s quality of life and satisfaction. The procedure is safe with positive results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery/Pan arab journal of neurosurgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/pajn.2025.354108.1165
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Decompression of Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technique and Outcome

Essam M. Rezk, Ayman Tayeb, Moaz M. Aly
Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery/Pan arab journal of neurosurgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Endoscopic Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Decompression of Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technique and Outcome

Essam M. Rezk, Ayman Tayeb, Moaz M. Aly
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) was adopted instead of traditional expanding laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) approach in patients with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis.METHODS: This is a retrospective clinical and radiological study of 42 patients treated with endoscopic ULBD for multilevel LSS at our center. The perioperative results were evaluated, including blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complications within one month postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed. A functional evaluation was conducted using Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire. Low back and leg pain were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at follow-up visits using visual analog scale (VAS). Macnab’s criteria were applied at the last postoperative follow-up for clinical efficacy evaluation.RESULTS: The mean operative time was 119.6±13.7 minutes. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 76.4±19.1mL. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.7 days. Operation-related complications were identified in two (4.8%) of the 42 patients. The VAS scores at postoperative 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up (back VAS: 1.8±0.67, 1.72±0.63, 1.54±0.67 respectively; leg VAS: 2.9±1.47, 2.18±1.22, 1.68±0.72 respectively) were significantly better than the preoperative ones (back VAS: 2.9±1.04; leg VAS: 6.45±1.14). Similarly, the ODI score at postoperative 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up (21.95±4.78, 17.22±4.09, 13.31±2.07 respectively) were significantly better than the preoperative one (43.54 ± 11.75). Macnab’s criteria revealed satisfactory subjective outcomes (good to excellent results) in 39 patients (92.9%) at the final follow-up.CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ULBD in multiple LSS relieves pain and improves patient’s quality of life and satisfaction. The procedure is safe with positive results.

Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery/Pan arab journal of neurosurgeryVol. 20(2)
King Abdullah Medical City (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.