131 Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) for Early Oesophageal Cancer – the Experience of a Tertiary Oesopgagogastric Resectional Unit

Abstract Aim Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a key technique in the staging and endoscopic management of early oesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report our tertiary resection centre’s experience over a 7-year period. Method All oesophageal adenocarcinoma EMR specimens, received by pathology from a single centre, between 01/2015 and 12/2022 were included. Outcome measures include nodule size; number of mucosecotmies per nodule; Presence of Negative Prognostic Indicators (NPIs): 1) submucosal involvement (T1b) 2) involved deep margin (R1) 3) lymphovascular invasion (LVI); Subsequent Oesophagectomy and resection T/N-stage; overall/disease related mortality; outcomes by NPI; and EMR complications. Results 87 patients underwent 181 mucosectomies: mean 2.1 per nodule (1-6); pT1b > pT1a (2.6 vs 1.8). Examining NPIs, 37 patients (42.5%) were pT1b; 21 (24.3%) had LVI; 21 (24.7%) were R1 at the deep margin. Oesophagectomy was performed in 16 patients, with 5 oesophagectomy patients (31.3%) found to have positive nodes. NPIs were positive predictors for surgery (HR 6.2) and disease related mortality (HR 2.7). Submucosal involvement was the highest individual predictor for surgery (HR 4.41), disease related mortality (HR 4.05), and node positivity at resection (HR 1.5). In patients with no NPIs, 39 (95.1%) were successfully managed with endoscopy only, and disease related mortality was reduced in this group (HR 0.38). EMR complication rate was 4.5%: 0 perforations, 1 haemorrhage, 3 strictures, and no deaths. Conclusions EMR safely stages early oesophageal adenocarcinoma and, if no NPIs, avoids the need for oesophagectomy in most patients. With NPI - and submucosal invasion in particular - proceeding to oesophagectomy should be carefully considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.151
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

131 Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) for Early Oesophageal Cancer – the Experience of a Tertiary Oesopgagogastric Resectional Unit

Ben Dickson, David J. Anderson, Carol Craig, Lewis Gall
British journal of surgery
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

131 Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) for Early Oesophageal Cancer – the Experience of a Tertiary Oesopgagogastric Resectional Unit

Ben Dickson, David J. Anderson, Carol Craig, Lewis Gall
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a key technique in the staging and endoscopic management of early oesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report our tertiary resection centre’s experience over a 7-year period. Method All oesophageal adenocarcinoma EMR specimens, received by pathology from a single centre, between 01/2015 and 12/2022 were included. Outcome measures include nodule size; number of mucosecotmies per nodule; Presence of Negative Prognostic Indicators (NPIs): 1) submucosal involvement (T1b) 2) involved deep margin (R1) 3) lymphovascular invasion (LVI); Subsequent Oesophagectomy and resection T/N-stage; overall/disease related mortality; outcomes by NPI; and EMR complications. Results 87 patients underwent 181 mucosectomies: mean 2.1 per nodule (1-6); pT1b > pT1a (2.6 vs 1.8). Examining NPIs, 37 patients (42.5%) were pT1b; 21 (24.3%) had LVI; 21 (24.7%) were R1 at the deep margin. Oesophagectomy was performed in 16 patients, with 5 oesophagectomy patients (31.3%) found to have positive nodes. NPIs were positive predictors for surgery (HR 6.2) and disease related mortality (HR 2.7). Submucosal involvement was the highest individual predictor for surgery (HR 4.41), disease related mortality (HR 4.05), and node positivity at resection (HR 1.5). In patients with no NPIs, 39 (95.1%) were successfully managed with endoscopy only, and disease related mortality was reduced in this group (HR 0.38). EMR complication rate was 4.5%: 0 perforations, 1 haemorrhage, 3 strictures, and no deaths. Conclusions EMR safely stages early oesophageal adenocarcinoma and, if no NPIs, avoids the need for oesophagectomy in most patients. With NPI - and submucosal invasion in particular - proceeding to oesophagectomy should be carefully considered.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.