PD67 Subsidy Of Monoclonal Antibodies In Brazil: What Criteria Influence Decisions by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC)?

Introduction Over the years many researchers have sought to understand the decision-making process of CONITEC, the Brazilian health technology assessment (HTA) agency. The emergence of high-cost technologies, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), has heightened the importance of delineating the decision-making criteria. This study aimed to elucidate the criteria employed by CONITEC for the incorporation of mAbs in Brazil. Methods All CONITEC reports published between 2019 and 2024 on mAbs were included. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize the data. The statistical significance between outcomes and covariates was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Logistic regressions were produced to evaluate the impact of each covariable on the recommendations. Results with a p-value of less than 0.10 were considered statistically significant due to the small sample size. All analyses were conducted using R software. Results After cleaning the database, 53 reports were included, encompassing 37 mAbs evaluated for 45 indications. Sixteen submissions (30.1%) received a positive recommendation. Efficacy (p=0.009) and the preliminary decisions (p<0.001) were significantly associated with the final recommendation. Further analysis showed that an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) below BRL150,000 (USD65,020) was associated with a higher chance of a positive recommendation (p=0.050). Logistic regression revealed that the logarithm of the ICER was significantly associated with recommendations (odds ratio 0.618; p=0.031), indicating that increasing the ICER by 2.7 times was associated with a 38.2 percent lower chance of listing. Conclusions Efficacy is important for decision-makers in Brazil. However, the results of economic analyses also influence the recommendation of mAbs. An ICER above BRL150,000 (USD65,020) per quality-adjusted life year significantly reduced the chances of a mAb being listed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325101992
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD67 Subsidy Of Monoclonal Antibodies In Brazil: What Criteria Influence Decisions by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC)?

Marcela Freitas, Marcus Carvalho Borin, Sérgio Adriano Loureiro Bersan, Júlia Teixeira Tupinambás et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

PD67 Subsidy Of Monoclonal Antibodies In Brazil: What Criteria Influence Decisions by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC)?

Marcela Freitas, Marcus Carvalho Borin, Sérgio Adriano Loureiro Bersan, Júlia Teixeira Tupinambás, Silvana Márcia Bruschi Kelles, Clarice Alegre Petramale, Karina Zocrato, Maria Rute Horta, André Soares Motta-Santos, Lélia Carvalho, Daniel Reis
article en

Abstract

Introduction Over the years many researchers have sought to understand the decision-making process of CONITEC, the Brazilian health technology assessment (HTA) agency. The emergence of high-cost technologies, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), has heightened the importance of delineating the decision-making criteria. This study aimed to elucidate the criteria employed by CONITEC for the incorporation of mAbs in Brazil. Methods All CONITEC reports published between 2019 and 2024 on mAbs were included. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize the data. The statistical significance between outcomes and covariates was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Logistic regressions were produced to evaluate the impact of each covariable on the recommendations. Results with a p-value of less than 0.10 were considered statistically significant due to the small sample size. All analyses were conducted using R software. Results After cleaning the database, 53 reports were included, encompassing 37 mAbs evaluated for 45 indications. Sixteen submissions (30.1%) received a positive recommendation. Efficacy (p=0.009) and the preliminary decisions (p<0.001) were significantly associated with the final recommendation. Further analysis showed that an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) below BRL150,000 (USD65,020) was associated with a higher chance of a positive recommendation (p=0.050). Logistic regression revealed that the logarithm of the ICER was significantly associated with recommendations (odds ratio 0.618; p=0.031), indicating that increasing the ICER by 2.7 times was associated with a 38.2 percent lower chance of listing. Conclusions Efficacy is important for decision-makers in Brazil. However, the results of economic analyses also influence the recommendation of mAbs. An ICER above BRL150,000 (USD65,020) per quality-adjusted life year significantly reduced the chances of a mAb being listed.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.