Assessing Early Childhood Sustainability Apps: A Dual-Framework Evaluation

(1) Background: using an artefact-based secondary analysis approach, this paper critically reviews eleven mobile applications designed for early childhood sustainability education. (2) Methods: the study employs a dual-framework evaluation rubric, based on Parsons and Ryu and on Ozdamli, which assesses ten criteria, including pedagogical approach, accessibility, and interdisciplinary integration. Two independent reviewers scored each app, with inter-rater reliability confirmed via Cohen’s kappa (0.74–1.00). (3) Results: results reveal a strong bias towards environmental SDGs, limited accessibility features, and minimal teacher-facing tools. Only one app addressed all three sustainability pillars: environmental, social, and economic. (4) Conclusions: the paper proposes AI-enhanced design strategies and culturally responsive workflows to improve app effectiveness. Recommendations include embedding interdisciplinary task flows, multilingual scaffolds, and community-linked challenges to support transformative sustainability learning in early childhood education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010299
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Early Childhood Sustainability Apps: A Dual-Framework Evaluation

Sin Chun. Ng, Chung Man Tang, Ka Lee Carrie Ho, Siu Nam Chan et al.
Sustainability
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Assessing Early Childhood Sustainability Apps: A Dual-Framework Evaluation

Sin Chun. Ng, Chung Man Tang, Ka Lee Carrie Ho, Siu Nam Chan, Yat Him Lee, Man Fai Leung
article en

Abstract

(1) Background: using an artefact-based secondary analysis approach, this paper critically reviews eleven mobile applications designed for early childhood sustainability education. (2) Methods: the study employs a dual-framework evaluation rubric, based on Parsons and Ryu and on Ozdamli, which assesses ten criteria, including pedagogical approach, accessibility, and interdisciplinary integration. Two independent reviewers scored each app, with inter-rater reliability confirmed via Cohen’s kappa (0.74–1.00). (3) Results: results reveal a strong bias towards environmental SDGs, limited accessibility features, and minimal teacher-facing tools. Only one app addressed all three sustainability pillars: environmental, social, and economic. (4) Conclusions: the paper proposes AI-enhanced design strategies and culturally responsive workflows to improve app effectiveness. Recommendations include embedding interdisciplinary task flows, multilingual scaffolds, and community-linked challenges to support transformative sustainability learning in early childhood education.

SustainabilityVol. 18(1)
Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Anglia Ruskin University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Early Childhood Sustainability Apps: A Dual-Framework Evaluation — Sin Chun. Ng, Chung Man Tang, et al. · Sustainability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS