Indoor Air Quality Assessment During the Use of Tobacco and Nicotine Products*

SUMMARY Chemical toxicants released into the environment during the use of tobacco and nicotine products potentially give rise to an elevated health risk among non-users. The aim of this study was to assess the levels of a wide range of chemical toxicants in the indoor air of an unventilated testing facility during various scenarios of tobacco and nicotine product use, including the use of conventional waterpipes, electronic vaping products (EVPs, also known as e-cigarettes), an electronic waterpipe which uses electrical heating of shisha tobacco instead of conventional charcoal heating, and combustible-cigarettes. In the one-occupant scenarios, increases in PM10 and PM2.5 were greatest during conventional waterpipe use, approximately 40% lower for OOKA electronic waterpipe use, and lowest for EVP use. An increase in the combustion by-product CO was greatest for conventional waterpipe use, and substantially lower for EVP and OOKA electronic waterpipe use, with the latter generating only a negligible amount of CO. The increase in formaldehyde levels was greatest for conventional waterpipe use, and substantially lower for OOKA electronic waterpipe use. In ten-occupant product use scenarios, increases in PM10 and PM2.5 were greatest for EVP use and slightly lower for OOKA electronic waterpipe use, lower during the cigarette smoking scenario, and lowest for the unattended conventional waterpipes scenario. Increases in CO and formaldehyde were highest for the conventional waterpipes scenario, substantially lower during cigarette smoking, and negligible for OOKA electronic waterpipe and EVP use. Increases in several other volatile organic compounds and some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were mainly seen only during cigarette smoking and were negligible during the other product use scenarios. This pattern was similar for the tobacco-specific nitrosamines NNN, NNK, and NAT. These findings have important implications concerning the potential for secondhand toxicant exposure among waterpipe non-users, and for understanding how to potentially reduce health risks associated with such exposure. [Contrib. Tob. Nicotine Res. 34 (2025) 230–241]

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2025-0021
Primary Topic
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indoor Air Quality Assessment During the Use of Tobacco and Nicotine Products*

Ian M. Fearon, Peter Wilkinson, Ronan Barry, Anna Clarke
Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
article

Indoor Air Quality Assessment During the Use of Tobacco and Nicotine Products*

Ian M. Fearon, Peter Wilkinson, Ronan Barry, Anna Clarke
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY Chemical toxicants released into the environment during the use of tobacco and nicotine products potentially give rise to an elevated health risk among non-users. The aim of this study was to assess the levels of a wide range of chemical toxicants in the indoor air of an unventilated testing facility during various scenarios of tobacco and nicotine product use, including the use of conventional waterpipes, electronic vaping products (EVPs, also known as e-cigarettes), an electronic waterpipe which uses electrical heating of shisha tobacco instead of conventional charcoal heating, and combustible-cigarettes. In the one-occupant scenarios, increases in PM10 and PM2.5 were greatest during conventional waterpipe use, approximately 40% lower for OOKA electronic waterpipe use, and lowest for EVP use. An increase in the combustion by-product CO was greatest for conventional waterpipe use, and substantially lower for EVP and OOKA electronic waterpipe use, with the latter generating only a negligible amount of CO. The increase in formaldehyde levels was greatest for conventional waterpipe use, and substantially lower for OOKA electronic waterpipe use. In ten-occupant product use scenarios, increases in PM10 and PM2.5 were greatest for EVP use and slightly lower for OOKA electronic waterpipe use, lower during the cigarette smoking scenario, and lowest for the unattended conventional waterpipes scenario. Increases in CO and formaldehyde were highest for the conventional waterpipes scenario, substantially lower during cigarette smoking, and negligible for OOKA electronic waterpipe and EVP use. Increases in several other volatile organic compounds and some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were mainly seen only during cigarette smoking and were negligible during the other product use scenarios. This pattern was similar for the tobacco-specific nitrosamines NNN, NNK, and NAT. These findings have important implications concerning the potential for secondhand toxicant exposure among waterpipe non-users, and for understanding how to potentially reduce health risks associated with such exposure. [Contrib. Tob. Nicotine Res. 34 (2025) 230–241]

Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine ResearchVol. 34(5)
Research Complex at Harwell (GB), The Princeton Festival (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.