Efficacy and safety of newer biologic therapies in psoriasis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT The chronic skin disorder known as psoriasis is caused by various factors, such as genetics, environmental factors, and immune system dysfunction. It is characterized by a high number of cases of plaque psoriasis. Biologic drugs have revolutionized the treatment of this condition. Our research intends to examine the influence of biological therapies on the quality of life, comparing the effectiveness and potential risks of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, assess their adverse effects, and determine their cost-effectiveness in treating psoriasis. A systematic review was carried out using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses standards, with electronic databases searched for research on psoriasis, biologics, TNF-α, and IL-17 inhibitors. Studies published in the last 5 years were included in the study. Eligible studies encompassed randomized controlled trials, observational research, and case–control studies. Meta-analysis indicators included risk ratio (RR), standard error, random effects, and confidence intervals. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and heterogeneity was examined using random-effects regression. Despite significant variability ( I 2 values: efficacy 96%, safety 94%), the meta-analysis found both interventions effective and safe. The efficacy RR of 0.69 showed substantial improvement in psoriasis control, and the safety RR of 0.54 indicated fewer side effects. Both efficacy and safety results were statistically significant ( P < 0.05). Biologic therapies are effective and safe for psoriasis treatment, with a favorable risk–benefit profile. Future research should address the causes of heterogeneity and focus on improving treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal for Health Sciences
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_9_25
Primary Topic
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of newer biologic therapies in psoriasis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Azzam Alkhalifah, Alaa Ahmad Alqarni, Wafa Ali Alrezqi, Hanouf A Althobaiti et al.
Saudi Journal for Health Sciences
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
article

Efficacy and safety of newer biologic therapies in psoriasis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Azzam Alkhalifah, Alaa Ahmad Alqarni, Wafa Ali Alrezqi, Hanouf A Althobaiti, Marwa Salman Aldehailan, Hessah Abdulrahman Almojel, Ghadeer Yahya Almasabi, Sahar A. Alghamdi, Faris A. Neazy, Hadeel R. Almutairi, Amjd A. Alghamdi, Saleh S. Alzahrani, Shahad S. Alouf, Shahd A. Aleid
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The chronic skin disorder known as psoriasis is caused by various factors, such as genetics, environmental factors, and immune system dysfunction. It is characterized by a high number of cases of plaque psoriasis. Biologic drugs have revolutionized the treatment of this condition. Our research intends to examine the influence of biological therapies on the quality of life, comparing the effectiveness and potential risks of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, assess their adverse effects, and determine their cost-effectiveness in treating psoriasis. A systematic review was carried out using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses standards, with electronic databases searched for research on psoriasis, biologics, TNF-α, and IL-17 inhibitors. Studies published in the last 5 years were included in the study. Eligible studies encompassed randomized controlled trials, observational research, and case–control studies. Meta-analysis indicators included risk ratio (RR), standard error, random effects, and confidence intervals. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and heterogeneity was examined using random-effects regression. Despite significant variability ( I 2 values: efficacy 96%, safety 94%), the meta-analysis found both interventions effective and safe. The efficacy RR of 0.69 showed substantial improvement in psoriasis control, and the safety RR of 0.54 indicated fewer side effects. Both efficacy and safety results were statistically significant ( P < 0.05). Biologic therapies are effective and safe for psoriasis treatment, with a favorable risk–benefit profile. Future research should address the causes of heterogeneity and focus on improving treatment outcomes.

Saudi Journal for Health SciencesVol. 14(3)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Qassim University (SA), Taif University (SA), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), Umm al-Qura University (SA), Taibah University (SA), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), University of Jeddah (SA), King Faisal University (SA), Al Baha University (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.