PP21 Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening In Men: Systematic Review Of Cost Effectiveness

Introduction Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an abnormal dilation of the abdominal aorta, often asymptomatic but potentially fatal if ruptured. Introducing population-based ultrasound screening could support earlier detection and surgical repair. This systematic review assessed the cost effectiveness of population-based ultrasound screening for AAA in men versus no screening, and explored factors influencing cost effectiveness, as part of a health technology assessment. Methods Literature searches were conducted in electronic databases and gray literature sources (through to 23 July 2024). Screening, data extraction, quality appraisal (Consensus Health Economic Criteria list) and assessment of transferability (Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research questionnaire) were performed in duplicate (outlined in protocol CRD42024501141). Findings were presented with reference to the local decision context (Ireland). To facilitate comparison, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were converted to 2023 EUR. Cost effectiveness was interpreted using willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of EUR20,000 and EUR45,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Results Of 235 reviewed publications, 20 relevant studies were identified for inclusion and analyzed in detail (17 cost-utility analyses [CUAs] and three cost-effectiveness analyses [CEAs]). Screening was found to be cost effective at a WTP threshold of EUR45,000 per QALY in 16 of 17 CUAs (ICERs: EUR200 to EUR30,600 per QALY). CEAs reported ICERs between EUR7,500 and EUR16,100 per life year gained. In sensitivity analyses, AAA screening became less cost effective with decreasing AAA prevalence. None of the studies were considered transferable to the Irish context. Conclusions International evidence suggested that AAA screening in men was cost effective. However, despite the consistency of findings in the evidence base, declining AAA prevalence contributed to uncertainty about the long-term cost effectiveness of AAA screening in men.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325102419
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP21 Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening In Men: Systematic Review Of Cost Effectiveness

Susan Spillane, Karen Jordan, Máirín Ryan, Elaine Foley et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
article

PP21 Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening In Men: Systematic Review Of Cost Effectiveness

Susan Spillane, Karen Jordan, Máirín Ryan, Elaine Foley, Shelley O’Neill, Andres Santiago Quizhpi Lopez
article en

Abstract

Introduction Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an abnormal dilation of the abdominal aorta, often asymptomatic but potentially fatal if ruptured. Introducing population-based ultrasound screening could support earlier detection and surgical repair. This systematic review assessed the cost effectiveness of population-based ultrasound screening for AAA in men versus no screening, and explored factors influencing cost effectiveness, as part of a health technology assessment. Methods Literature searches were conducted in electronic databases and gray literature sources (through to 23 July 2024). Screening, data extraction, quality appraisal (Consensus Health Economic Criteria list) and assessment of transferability (Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research questionnaire) were performed in duplicate (outlined in protocol CRD42024501141). Findings were presented with reference to the local decision context (Ireland). To facilitate comparison, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were converted to 2023 EUR. Cost effectiveness was interpreted using willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of EUR20,000 and EUR45,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Results Of 235 reviewed publications, 20 relevant studies were identified for inclusion and analyzed in detail (17 cost-utility analyses [CUAs] and three cost-effectiveness analyses [CEAs]). Screening was found to be cost effective at a WTP threshold of EUR45,000 per QALY in 16 of 17 CUAs (ICERs: EUR200 to EUR30,600 per QALY). CEAs reported ICERs between EUR7,500 and EUR16,100 per life year gained. In sensitivity analyses, AAA screening became less cost effective with decreasing AAA prevalence. None of the studies were considered transferable to the Irish context. Conclusions International evidence suggested that AAA screening in men was cost effective. However, despite the consistency of findings in the evidence base, declining AAA prevalence contributed to uncertainty about the long-term cost effectiveness of AAA screening in men.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.