Immersive Bridge Inspection: Quantifying the Benefits of XR for Anomaly Detection

We present an immersive bridge inspection tool as part of a digital twin for bridges that merges virtual reality (VR) with AI-assisted anomaly detection to evaluate how extended reality (XR) tools can modernize bridge inspections. Two tasks were studied: (i) relocating previously reported anomalies and (ii) detecting new surface anomalies using XR technologies. XR cues and simulated AI prompts were compared with manual inspection for five key performance indicators. Results show that XR + AI cut average detection time by 51%, boosted accuracy by 38%, lowered subjectivity by 11%, and reduced cognitive workload by 23 NASA-TLX points. A post-study survey yielded favorable usability and usefulness ratings, although some volunteers experienced VR-induced discomfort. These findings demonstrate the promise of XR and AI to accelerate, objectify, and lighten the mental load of structural assessments, while highlighting usability challenges that must be addressed for field deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3714394.3756250
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immersive Bridge Inspection: Quantifying the Benefits of XR for Anomaly Detection

Duc V. Le, Özlem Durmaz İncel, Berend Jan van der Zwaag, Ali Sabzi Khoshraftar
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Immersive Bridge Inspection: Quantifying the Benefits of XR for Anomaly Detection

Duc V. Le, Özlem Durmaz İncel, Berend Jan van der Zwaag, Ali Sabzi Khoshraftar
article en

Abstract

We present an immersive bridge inspection tool as part of a digital twin for bridges that merges virtual reality (VR) with AI-assisted anomaly detection to evaluate how extended reality (XR) tools can modernize bridge inspections. Two tasks were studied: (i) relocating previously reported anomalies and (ii) detecting new surface anomalies using XR technologies. XR cues and simulated AI prompts were compared with manual inspection for five key performance indicators. Results show that XR + AI cut average detection time by 51%, boosted accuracy by 38%, lowered subjectivity by 11%, and reduced cognitive workload by 23 NASA-TLX points. A post-study survey yielded favorable usability and usefulness ratings, although some volunteers experienced VR-induced discomfort. These findings demonstrate the promise of XR and AI to accelerate, objectify, and lighten the mental load of structural assessments, while highlighting usability challenges that must be addressed for field deployment.

University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.