Assessing Irish Merger Control: How a Small National Competition Authority Can Make a Big Impact

Ireland is an increasingly interesting and prominent jurisdiction in merger control, both from a European and international perspective. Due to the level of multinational corporate investment into the country (particularly in digital and pharmaceutical industries), Ireland has a somewhat disproportionate level of importance when compared to other jurisdictions of a similar size in the EU. In addition, the Irish competition authority, the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (‘CCPC’), has recently been granted several additional powers when reviewing mergers. Further, it appears to be adopting a more aggressive and interventionist stance, for example, by taking the previously unusual step of prohibiting a number of transactions and requiring extensive remedies across several cases. Alongside the changes in Irish merger control, the EU Commission is faced with the resurrected challenge of below-threshold mergers as a result of the Court of Justice of the EU’s (‘CJEU’) judgment in Illumina v. Commission. This decision has scuppered its ability to rely on Article 22 of the EU Merger Regulation (‘EUMR’) to access problematic acquisitions in digital and pharmaceutical markets. As a result, there is a strong possibility that national competition authorities (‘NCAs’) with the ability to ‘call-in’ transactions that fall outside the EU’s notification thresholds may be required to do so to plug this gap that has re-emerged in European merger control. In this context, with Ireland positioned as an extremely important corporate hub and the CCPC likely to be faced with an expanding mandate over the coming years, this article offers a timely review of the Irish authority’s activities over the past five years as a means of synthesizing trends that can be observed (as well as potential future developments). It does so by tracing through the assessments of mergers systematically over this period (2020–24) from their initiation by way of notification to the CCPC, all the way through to determinations, remedies, and prohibitions. By taking this approach, the article extracts information and points of interest from the various stages as a means of shaping merger parties’ expectations of the process, as well as providing key advice for other NCAs in the EU.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Competition
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/woco2025032
Primary Topic
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Irish Merger Control: How a Small National Competition Authority Can Make a Big Impact

Richard Bunworth
World Competition
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
article

Assessing Irish Merger Control: How a Small National Competition Authority Can Make a Big Impact

Richard Bunworth
article en

Abstract

Ireland is an increasingly interesting and prominent jurisdiction in merger control, both from a European and international perspective. Due to the level of multinational corporate investment into the country (particularly in digital and pharmaceutical industries), Ireland has a somewhat disproportionate level of importance when compared to other jurisdictions of a similar size in the EU. In addition, the Irish competition authority, the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (‘CCPC’), has recently been granted several additional powers when reviewing mergers. Further, it appears to be adopting a more aggressive and interventionist stance, for example, by taking the previously unusual step of prohibiting a number of transactions and requiring extensive remedies across several cases. Alongside the changes in Irish merger control, the EU Commission is faced with the resurrected challenge of below-threshold mergers as a result of the Court of Justice of the EU’s (‘CJEU’) judgment in Illumina v. Commission. This decision has scuppered its ability to rely on Article 22 of the EU Merger Regulation (‘EUMR’) to access problematic acquisitions in digital and pharmaceutical markets. As a result, there is a strong possibility that national competition authorities (‘NCAs’) with the ability to ‘call-in’ transactions that fall outside the EU’s notification thresholds may be required to do so to plug this gap that has re-emerged in European merger control. In this context, with Ireland positioned as an extremely important corporate hub and the CCPC likely to be faced with an expanding mandate over the coming years, this article offers a timely review of the Irish authority’s activities over the past five years as a means of synthesizing trends that can be observed (as well as potential future developments). It does so by tracing through the assessments of mergers systematically over this period (2020–24) from their initiation by way of notification to the CCPC, all the way through to determinations, remedies, and prohibitions. By taking this approach, the article extracts information and points of interest from the various stages as a means of shaping merger parties’ expectations of the process, as well as providing key advice for other NCAs in the EU.

World CompetitionVol. 48(Issue 4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Irish Merger Control: How a Small National Competition Authority Can Make a Big Impact — Richard Bunworth · World Competition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS