Characterization of the Regenerative Capacity of Membranes in the Presence of Fouling by Microalgae Using Detergents

The filtration of microalgae generates fouling through algal matter and exopolymer particles with consequences for the flow rate. Therefore, regeneration that is as complete and continuous as possible is necessary. For this purpose, a commercial membrane with a pore size of 0.8 µm is contaminated with the microalgae mixture Haematoccocus Pluvialis and Tetradesmus obliquus, and then regenerated with mechanical (backwashing), chemical (HCl, NaOH, NaClO, P3-Ultrasil) and biological (dishwashing and laundry detergents) cleaning methods. The filtration time of the individual experiments is compared with a new membrane, and the increase is determined. Backwashing cleans the pores, but the biofilm sticks to the membrane surface and blocks the pores shortly after a new cycle. It was shown that the biofilm can only be removed chemically through oxidative effects or anionic surfactants. Hydrolysis does not remove the biofilm, and it can actually make the blockage worse. Bigger cellular residues can only be removed with enzymes. This improves cleaning performance by 61% compared to commercial cleaning agents for membranes and 42% compared to backwashing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Membranes
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes16010007
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of the Regenerative Capacity of Membranes in the Presence of Fouling by Microalgae Using Detergents

Hermann Nirschl, Volker Bächle, Marco Gleiß
Membranes
Membrane Separation Technologies
article

Characterization of the Regenerative Capacity of Membranes in the Presence of Fouling by Microalgae Using Detergents

Hermann Nirschl, Volker Bächle, Marco Gleiß
article en

Abstract

The filtration of microalgae generates fouling through algal matter and exopolymer particles with consequences for the flow rate. Therefore, regeneration that is as complete and continuous as possible is necessary. For this purpose, a commercial membrane with a pore size of 0.8 µm is contaminated with the microalgae mixture Haematoccocus Pluvialis and Tetradesmus obliquus, and then regenerated with mechanical (backwashing), chemical (HCl, NaOH, NaClO, P3-Ultrasil) and biological (dishwashing and laundry detergents) cleaning methods. The filtration time of the individual experiments is compared with a new membrane, and the increase is determined. Backwashing cleans the pores, but the biofilm sticks to the membrane surface and blocks the pores shortly after a new cycle. It was shown that the biofilm can only be removed chemically through oxidative effects or anionic surfactants. Hydrolysis does not remove the biofilm, and it can actually make the blockage worse. Bigger cellular residues can only be removed with enzymes. This improves cleaning performance by 61% compared to commercial cleaning agents for membranes and 42% compared to backwashing.

MembranesVol. 16(1)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Membrane Separation Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.