OP19 Clinical Effectiveness Of Glucocorticoids For The Treatment Of Knee Osteoarthritis – Systematic Review And Longitudinal Meta-Analysis

Introduction Globally, knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and disabling condition. Intra-articular glucocorticoid injection (IAGI) is widely used to treat knee OA. However, there is conflicting evidence on the benefit-harm profile of IAGI for this indication. This study aimed to determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of IAGI for knee OA. Methods Systematic literature searches were conducted in three biomedical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library) through to 4 October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared IAGI with no treatment, sham injection, or oral placebo in patients with knee OA were included. RCTs were appraised using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Longitudinal meta-analysis (LMA) was conducted for predetermined outcomes (i.e., pain, function, health-related quality of life [HRQoL], care utilization, adverse events [AEs], and serious adverse events) at one month, three months, six months, and 12 months. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted at individual time points if there was insufficient evidence to conduct a LMA. The research project was funded by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health. Results In total, 16 RCTs comprising 1,522 patients with knee OA were included. The LMA reported a small reduction in pain at one month (standardized mean difference: −0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.52, −0.08), but no clinically or statistically significant differences from three to 12 months. Regarding function, the LMA found no significant differences at any time point. Pairwise meta-analyses at one month showed reduced care utilization favoring IAGI (mean difference −0.43; 95% CI: −0.81, −0.05), but not at other time points, and no differences in HRQoL at any time point. No significant safety concerns were found in relation to AEs and serious AEs. Conclusions IAGI provided short-term pain relief for knee OA at one month post-injection, with beneficial effects diminishing by three months and beyond. There were no substantial improvements in function or HRQoL. No significant safety concerns were identified. To guide clinical decision-making, further research should focus on HRQoL as well as potential subgroups of patients that may benefit in the longer term.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325100779
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP19 Clinical Effectiveness Of Glucocorticoids For The Treatment Of Knee Osteoarthritis – Systematic Review And Longitudinal Meta-Analysis

Magdalena Ruth Moshi, Thomas Vreugdenburg, Alvin Atlas, Danielle Stringer et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
article

OP19 Clinical Effectiveness Of Glucocorticoids For The Treatment Of Knee Osteoarthritis – Systematic Review And Longitudinal Meta-Analysis

Magdalena Ruth Moshi, Thomas Vreugdenburg, Alvin Atlas, Danielle Stringer, John Rathbone
article en

Abstract

Introduction Globally, knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and disabling condition. Intra-articular glucocorticoid injection (IAGI) is widely used to treat knee OA. However, there is conflicting evidence on the benefit-harm profile of IAGI for this indication. This study aimed to determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of IAGI for knee OA. Methods Systematic literature searches were conducted in three biomedical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library) through to 4 October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared IAGI with no treatment, sham injection, or oral placebo in patients with knee OA were included. RCTs were appraised using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Longitudinal meta-analysis (LMA) was conducted for predetermined outcomes (i.e., pain, function, health-related quality of life [HRQoL], care utilization, adverse events [AEs], and serious adverse events) at one month, three months, six months, and 12 months. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted at individual time points if there was insufficient evidence to conduct a LMA. The research project was funded by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health. Results In total, 16 RCTs comprising 1,522 patients with knee OA were included. The LMA reported a small reduction in pain at one month (standardized mean difference: −0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.52, −0.08), but no clinically or statistically significant differences from three to 12 months. Regarding function, the LMA found no significant differences at any time point. Pairwise meta-analyses at one month showed reduced care utilization favoring IAGI (mean difference −0.43; 95% CI: −0.81, −0.05), but not at other time points, and no differences in HRQoL at any time point. No significant safety concerns were found in relation to AEs and serious AEs. Conclusions IAGI provided short-term pain relief for knee OA at one month post-injection, with beneficial effects diminishing by three months and beyond. There were no substantial improvements in function or HRQoL. No significant safety concerns were identified. To guide clinical decision-making, further research should focus on HRQoL as well as potential subgroups of patients that may benefit in the longer term.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.