Anger Speaks Louder? Exploring the Effects of AI Nonverbal Emotional Cues on Human Decision Certainty in Moral Dilemmas

Exploring moral dilemmas allows individuals to navigate moral complexity, where a reversal in decision certainty - shifting toward the opposite of one's initial choice - could reflect open-mindedness and less rigidity. This study probes how nonverbal emotional cues from conversational agents could influence decision certainty in moral dilemmas. While existing research heavily focused on verbal aspects of human-agent interaction, we investigated the impact of agents expressing anger and sadness towards the moral situations through animated chat balloons. We compared these with a baseline where agents offered same responses without nonverbal cues. Results show that agents displaying anger significantly induced reversal shifts in decision certainty. The interaction between participant gender and agents' nonverbal emotional cues significantly affects participants' perception of AI's influence. These findings reveal that even subtly altering agents' nonverbal cues may impact human moral decisions, presenting both opportunities to leverage these effects for positive outcomes and ethical risks for future human-AI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3714394.3754387
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anger Speaks Louder? Exploring the Effects of AI Nonverbal Emotional Cues on Human Decision Certainty in Moral Dilemmas

Tian Zeng, Zhenhao Zhang, Chenyi Zhang, Wei Zhang et al.
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Anger Speaks Louder? Exploring the Effects of AI Nonverbal Emotional Cues on Human Decision Certainty in Moral Dilemmas

Tian Zeng, Zhenhao Zhang, Chenyi Zhang, Wei Zhang, Pengcheng An, Black Sun
article en

Abstract

Exploring moral dilemmas allows individuals to navigate moral complexity, where a reversal in decision certainty - shifting toward the opposite of one's initial choice - could reflect open-mindedness and less rigidity. This study probes how nonverbal emotional cues from conversational agents could influence decision certainty in moral dilemmas. While existing research heavily focused on verbal aspects of human-agent interaction, we investigated the impact of agents expressing anger and sadness towards the moral situations through animated chat balloons. We compared these with a baseline where agents offered same responses without nonverbal cues. Results show that agents displaying anger significantly induced reversal shifts in decision certainty. The interaction between participant gender and agents' nonverbal emotional cues significantly affects participants' perception of AI's influence. These findings reveal that even subtly altering agents' nonverbal cues may impact human moral decisions, presenting both opportunities to leverage these effects for positive outcomes and ethical risks for future human-AI systems.

Shenzhen University (CN), Aarhus University (DK), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anger Speaks Louder? Exploring the Effects of AI Nonverbal Emotional Cues on Human Decision Certainty in Moral Dilemmas — Tian Zeng, Zhenhao Zhang, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS