Barefoot or Shod? The Impact of Footwear on Children’s Gait: A Systematic Review with an Exploratory Meta-Analysis

Background: Footwear may influence paediatric gait biomechanics, yet evidence across footwear types and barefoot conditions remains heterogeneous. This review aimed to synthesise evidence on how footwear affects gait biomechanics in children and adolescents compared with barefoot walking, and to conduct exploratory meta-analyses when feasible. Methods: We performed a PRISMA-guided systematic review (PubMed and Scopus; inception to November 2025) including participants < 18 years with gait outcomes assessed under barefoot and/or defined footwear conditions. Outcomes included spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic, and plantar-pressure variables. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Random-effects meta-analyses (inverse-variance) were conducted only when ≥2 studies reported comparable outcomes. Results: Twenty-two studies were included; most were observational with overall moderate-to-serious risk of bias, mainly due to confounding and participant selection. Quantitative synthesis (exploratory): Meta-analyses were possible only for ankle plantarflexion (k = 2) and stride length (k = 3) and showed non-significant pooled effects with extreme heterogeneity (I2 > 90%) and wide prediction intervals. Narrative synthesis: For other outcomes, heterogeneity in designs, footwear definitions, and measurement protocols precluded pooling; conventional footwear may reduce metatarsophalangeal mobility and alter kinematics and plantar pressure in some contexts, while minimalist/biomimetic features may approximate barefoot-like values for selected parameters without implying equivalence. Conclusions: Footwear exposure in childhood may affect several gait-related parameters, but the certainty of evidence is low to moderate due to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Standardised footwear classifications, harmonised gait protocols, and longitudinal studies are needed to clarify developmental implications and inform evidence-based guidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010286
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barefoot or Shod? The Impact of Footwear on Children’s Gait: A Systematic Review with an Exploratory Meta-Analysis

Gabriel Gijón-Nogueron, Esther Chicharro-Luna, Coral Moya-Cuenca
Applied Sciences
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Barefoot or Shod? The Impact of Footwear on Children’s Gait: A Systematic Review with an Exploratory Meta-Analysis

Gabriel Gijón-Nogueron, Esther Chicharro-Luna, Coral Moya-Cuenca
article en

Abstract

Background: Footwear may influence paediatric gait biomechanics, yet evidence across footwear types and barefoot conditions remains heterogeneous. This review aimed to synthesise evidence on how footwear affects gait biomechanics in children and adolescents compared with barefoot walking, and to conduct exploratory meta-analyses when feasible. Methods: We performed a PRISMA-guided systematic review (PubMed and Scopus; inception to November 2025) including participants < 18 years with gait outcomes assessed under barefoot and/or defined footwear conditions. Outcomes included spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic, and plantar-pressure variables. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Random-effects meta-analyses (inverse-variance) were conducted only when ≥2 studies reported comparable outcomes. Results: Twenty-two studies were included; most were observational with overall moderate-to-serious risk of bias, mainly due to confounding and participant selection. Quantitative synthesis (exploratory): Meta-analyses were possible only for ankle plantarflexion (k = 2) and stride length (k = 3) and showed non-significant pooled effects with extreme heterogeneity (I2 > 90%) and wide prediction intervals. Narrative synthesis: For other outcomes, heterogeneity in designs, footwear definitions, and measurement protocols precluded pooling; conventional footwear may reduce metatarsophalangeal mobility and alter kinematics and plantar pressure in some contexts, while minimalist/biomimetic features may approximate barefoot-like values for selected parameters without implying equivalence. Conclusions: Footwear exposure in childhood may affect several gait-related parameters, but the certainty of evidence is low to moderate due to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Standardised footwear classifications, harmonised gait protocols, and longitudinal studies are needed to clarify developmental implications and inform evidence-based guidance.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(1)
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), Servicio Murciano de Salud (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (ES), Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.