PD03 Diagnostic Accuracy Of Liquid Biopsy In Breast, Lung, And Colorectal Cancer

Introduction Liquid biopsy (LB) is a minimally invasive technique that enables analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by next generation sequencing (NGS) and has several potential applications in oncology. The main objective was to describe the diagnostic accuracy of LB over tissue biopsy for screening, diagnosis, and tumor mutation profiling in breast, lung, and colorectal cancer, including at different cancer stages. Methods Initially, a literature overview to select systematic reviews with meta-analyses or health technology assessment reports was conducted. When no data were obtained, a systematic review was conducted to select individual studies. For both procedures, a systematic literature search, two-step study selection, quality appraisal and a narrative synthesis were conducted. Results The only study in the screening setting involved colorectal cancer (sensitivity 14%, specificity 90%). Regarding initial cancer diagnosis, LB in breast cancer had a sensitivity ranging from 31 to 74 percent and a specificity of 66 to 92 percent, with inconsistent results by stage. For lung cancer, LB had a sensitivity of 22 to 86 percent and a specificity of 42 to 91 percent, with improved utility in advanced stages. Colorectal cancer studies using multicomponent tests showed sensitivities of 83 to 93 percent and specificities of more than 95%. LB ctDNA analysis in molecular profiling of advanced cancer had high accuracy in breast (PIK3CA), lung (epidermal growth factor receptor mutations), and colorectal cancer (NRAS/KRAS), with values for sensitivity of up to 83 percent and for specificity of around 90 percent. Conclusions No results were available for screening in breast and lung cancer. Limited evidence for colorectal cancer showed low sensitivity but high specificity for LB over tissue biopsy. Initial cancer diagnosis results were heterogeneous, with inconsistencies in breast and colorectal stages but improvements in advanced lung cancer. Tumor profiling provided the strongest evidence, with high diagnostic utility relative to tissue biopsy across all three cancer types.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325101414
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD03 Diagnostic Accuracy Of Liquid Biopsy In Breast, Lung, And Colorectal Cancer

Rosa Maria Vivanco‐Hidalgo, Anna Godo, Maria Dolors Estrada Sabadell
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

PD03 Diagnostic Accuracy Of Liquid Biopsy In Breast, Lung, And Colorectal Cancer

Rosa Maria Vivanco‐Hidalgo, Anna Godo, Maria Dolors Estrada Sabadell
article en

Abstract

Introduction Liquid biopsy (LB) is a minimally invasive technique that enables analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by next generation sequencing (NGS) and has several potential applications in oncology. The main objective was to describe the diagnostic accuracy of LB over tissue biopsy for screening, diagnosis, and tumor mutation profiling in breast, lung, and colorectal cancer, including at different cancer stages. Methods Initially, a literature overview to select systematic reviews with meta-analyses or health technology assessment reports was conducted. When no data were obtained, a systematic review was conducted to select individual studies. For both procedures, a systematic literature search, two-step study selection, quality appraisal and a narrative synthesis were conducted. Results The only study in the screening setting involved colorectal cancer (sensitivity 14%, specificity 90%). Regarding initial cancer diagnosis, LB in breast cancer had a sensitivity ranging from 31 to 74 percent and a specificity of 66 to 92 percent, with inconsistent results by stage. For lung cancer, LB had a sensitivity of 22 to 86 percent and a specificity of 42 to 91 percent, with improved utility in advanced stages. Colorectal cancer studies using multicomponent tests showed sensitivities of 83 to 93 percent and specificities of more than 95%. LB ctDNA analysis in molecular profiling of advanced cancer had high accuracy in breast (PIK3CA), lung (epidermal growth factor receptor mutations), and colorectal cancer (NRAS/KRAS), with values for sensitivity of up to 83 percent and for specificity of around 90 percent. Conclusions No results were available for screening in breast and lung cancer. Limited evidence for colorectal cancer showed low sensitivity but high specificity for LB over tissue biopsy. Initial cancer diagnosis results were heterogeneous, with inconsistencies in breast and colorectal stages but improvements in advanced lung cancer. Tumor profiling provided the strongest evidence, with high diagnostic utility relative to tissue biopsy across all three cancer types.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PD03 Diagnostic Accuracy Of Liquid Biopsy In Breast, Lung, And Colorectal Cancer — Rosa Maria Vivanco‐Hidalgo, Anna Godo, et al. · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS