Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Scaffold-Based Drug Delivery for Tissue Regeneration

Tissue regeneration is essential for wound healing, organ function restoration, and overall patient recovery. Its success significantly impacts medical procedures in fields like internal medicine and orthopedics, enhancing patient quality of life. Recent advances in regenerative medicine, particularly the combination of advanced drug delivery systems (DDS) and bioengineering, have enabled customized methods to improve tissue regeneration outcomes. However, conventional tissue engineering techniques have drawbacks, often using static scaffolds that lack the dynamic properties of real tissues, leading to subpar healing outcomes. The use of 3D printing and other advanced scaffolding techniques allows for the creation of bio functional scaffolds that deliver bioactive molecules at precise locations and times. The optimal integration of biological systems with enhanced material properties for personalized treatment options remains unclear. There is a need for more research into the complex interactions between cellular biology, drug delivery, and material technology to improve tissue regeneration. Despite progress in developing bioactive scaffolds and localized drug delivery methods, the interactions among different scaffold materials, bioactive agents, and cellular behaviors within the regenerative ecosystem are not fully understood. While there is extensive research on 3D-printed scaffolds in tissue engineering, there is a lack of studies integrating bio printing with in vivo biological reactions in real time. Limited research on the dynamic integration of patient-specific parameters in regeneration methods highlights the need for customized approaches that consider individual physiological differences and the complex biological environment at injury sites. Additionally, challenges arise when translating laboratory results into effective therapeutic applications, underscoring the necessity for interdisciplinary collaboration and innovative design approaches that align advanced material properties with biological needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10010009
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Scaffold-Based Drug Delivery for Tissue Regeneration

Muneeb Ullah, Abdul Wahab, Muhammad Naeem, Sania Ikram et al.
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Scaffold-Based Drug Delivery for Tissue Regeneration

Muneeb Ullah, Abdul Wahab, Muhammad Naeem, Sania Ikram, Maryam Aftab
article en

Abstract

Tissue regeneration is essential for wound healing, organ function restoration, and overall patient recovery. Its success significantly impacts medical procedures in fields like internal medicine and orthopedics, enhancing patient quality of life. Recent advances in regenerative medicine, particularly the combination of advanced drug delivery systems (DDS) and bioengineering, have enabled customized methods to improve tissue regeneration outcomes. However, conventional tissue engineering techniques have drawbacks, often using static scaffolds that lack the dynamic properties of real tissues, leading to subpar healing outcomes. The use of 3D printing and other advanced scaffolding techniques allows for the creation of bio functional scaffolds that deliver bioactive molecules at precise locations and times. The optimal integration of biological systems with enhanced material properties for personalized treatment options remains unclear. There is a need for more research into the complex interactions between cellular biology, drug delivery, and material technology to improve tissue regeneration. Despite progress in developing bioactive scaffolds and localized drug delivery methods, the interactions among different scaffold materials, bioactive agents, and cellular behaviors within the regenerative ecosystem are not fully understood. While there is extensive research on 3D-printed scaffolds in tissue engineering, there is a lack of studies integrating bio printing with in vivo biological reactions in real time. Limited research on the dynamic integration of patient-specific parameters in regeneration methods highlights the need for customized approaches that consider individual physiological differences and the complex biological environment at injury sites. Additionally, challenges arise when translating laboratory results into effective therapeutic applications, underscoring the necessity for interdisciplinary collaboration and innovative design approaches that align advanced material properties with biological needs.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 10(1)
Rawalpindi Medical University (PK), Kohat University of Science and Technology (PK), National University of Medical Sciences (PK), Pusan National University (KR), Fatima Jinnah Women University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.