230 Five-Year Review of Splenic Injury Management in Major Trauma: Northern Scotland Experience

Abstract Background Splenic trauma is a potentially life-threatening condition and requires timely and appropriate management. North of Scotland trauma team in collaboration with Scottish Trauma Audit Group (STAG), undertook a retrospective review to evaluate patterns of injury, management strategies, and outcomes of splenic trauma. Method Data were collected from trauma calls between January 2019 and December 2023. Of 240 trauma patients reviewed, 72 cases of splenic trauma were identified, with 70 included in the final analysis. Injuries were classified by mechanism (blunt vs. sharp), haemodynamic stability, and severity using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading system. Management approaches included non-operative management (NOM), interventional radiology (IR), and surgical intervention. Results 76% patients (53) were male with an age range of 16-87 years (average age 45.5years). The vast majority (97%) sustained blunt trauma. Non-operative management was successfully employed in 48 cases (74%) while 18 patinets (26%) required surgical intervention. The likelihood of NOM failure increased with higher injury grade. Complications observed included delayed splenic rupture, rebleeding, and five readmissions within 30 days. Among surgical group, 11% experienced complications (intra-abdominal collection, adhesion obstruction). A treatment algorithm was developed to guide management based on haemodynamic status and AAST injury grade. Limitations included incomplete data and retrospective challenges in assessing haemodynamic status. Conclusions Structured, multidisciplinary management of splenic trauma, guided by clinical algorithms and grading systems, can optimize patient outcomes. Continued data collection and pathway refinement is ongoing work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.056
Primary Topic
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

230 Five-Year Review of Splenic Injury Management in Major Trauma: Northern Scotland Experience

Akshay Sethi, Katharine Forsyth, Ahmed Salih, Amira Orabi et al.
British journal of surgery
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
article

230 Five-Year Review of Splenic Injury Management in Major Trauma: Northern Scotland Experience

Akshay Sethi, Katharine Forsyth, Ahmed Salih, Amira Orabi, Mudassar Ghazanfar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Splenic trauma is a potentially life-threatening condition and requires timely and appropriate management. North of Scotland trauma team in collaboration with Scottish Trauma Audit Group (STAG), undertook a retrospective review to evaluate patterns of injury, management strategies, and outcomes of splenic trauma. Method Data were collected from trauma calls between January 2019 and December 2023. Of 240 trauma patients reviewed, 72 cases of splenic trauma were identified, with 70 included in the final analysis. Injuries were classified by mechanism (blunt vs. sharp), haemodynamic stability, and severity using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading system. Management approaches included non-operative management (NOM), interventional radiology (IR), and surgical intervention. Results 76% patients (53) were male with an age range of 16-87 years (average age 45.5years). The vast majority (97%) sustained blunt trauma. Non-operative management was successfully employed in 48 cases (74%) while 18 patinets (26%) required surgical intervention. The likelihood of NOM failure increased with higher injury grade. Complications observed included delayed splenic rupture, rebleeding, and five readmissions within 30 days. Among surgical group, 11% experienced complications (intra-abdominal collection, adhesion obstruction). A treatment algorithm was developed to guide management based on haemodynamic status and AAST injury grade. Limitations included incomplete data and retrospective challenges in assessing haemodynamic status. Conclusions Structured, multidisciplinary management of splenic trauma, guided by clinical algorithms and grading systems, can optimize patient outcomes. Continued data collection and pathway refinement is ongoing work.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
NHS Grampian (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.