Modeling of the vertical gravity gradient in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Methods, Comparison and Evaluation of Accuracy

This study investigates the modeling of the vertical gravity gradient (VGG) in the Republic of Kazakhstan using three non-instrumental methods: global geopotential models (GGMs), a precomputed VGG grid from the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP), and a method combining the normal gravity field with digital elevation models (DEMs). The research compares these modeled VGG values with high-precision measurements from 48 outdoor gravity stations, employing Scintrex CG-6 gravimeters for indirect VGG determination. Key findings reveal that topographic modeling is unreliable for stations located in depressions due to unaccounted mass above benchmarks. At the same time, GGMs provide results comparable to the normal gradient but lack resolution for stations on elevated terrain. After excluding problematic stations, modeling accuracy improved to approximately 10 μGal/m. The study concludes that while direct VGG measurements remain essential near the Earth's surface, modeled values can offer better accuracy than theoretical corrections in specific scenarios, depending on the detail of input data. The research highlights the importance of VGG in geodesy and gravimetry, particularly for high-precision applications. It underscores the limitations of current modeling techniques in accounting for local topographic and subsurface density variations. The work contributes to refining methods of gravity data reduction and supports the development of Kazakhstan's geodetic infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geodesy and Geodynamics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2025.10.001
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling of the vertical gravity gradient in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Methods, Comparison and Evaluation of Accuracy

Oleg Odalović, Д. Н. Голдобин, В. Ф. Канушин, Nurgan Kemerbayev et al.
Geodesy and Geodynamics
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

Modeling of the vertical gravity gradient in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Methods, Comparison and Evaluation of Accuracy

Oleg Odalović, Д. Н. Голдобин, В. Ф. Канушин, Nurgan Kemerbayev, Nikolay Kosarev, Roman Sermiagin
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the modeling of the vertical gravity gradient (VGG) in the Republic of Kazakhstan using three non-instrumental methods: global geopotential models (GGMs), a precomputed VGG grid from the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP), and a method combining the normal gravity field with digital elevation models (DEMs). The research compares these modeled VGG values with high-precision measurements from 48 outdoor gravity stations, employing Scintrex CG-6 gravimeters for indirect VGG determination. Key findings reveal that topographic modeling is unreliable for stations located in depressions due to unaccounted mass above benchmarks. At the same time, GGMs provide results comparable to the normal gradient but lack resolution for stations on elevated terrain. After excluding problematic stations, modeling accuracy improved to approximately 10 μGal/m. The study concludes that while direct VGG measurements remain essential near the Earth's surface, modeled values can offer better accuracy than theoretical corrections in specific scenarios, depending on the detail of input data. The research highlights the importance of VGG in geodesy and gravimetry, particularly for high-precision applications. It underscores the limitations of current modeling techniques in accounting for local topographic and subsurface density variations. The work contributes to refining methods of gravity data reduction and supports the development of Kazakhstan's geodetic infrastructure.

Geodesy and Geodynamics
Centre National d'Études Spatiales (FR), University of Belgrade (RS), Astana Medical University (KZ), Siberian State University Geosystems and Technology (RU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.