OP37 How Can We Make Innovative Payment Schemes Work? Findings Of A European Union Horizon Europe Project

Introduction Innovative payment schemes have been widely proposed as a solution for dealing with uncertainties in cost and outcomes associated with the introduction of new health technologies. These schemes incorporate risk sharing, either by changing the method of paying for the health technology or by requesting more long-term evidence on outcomes. However, payers’ experiences with these schemes are mixed. Methods A work package of the Health Innovation Next Generation Payment and Pricing Models (HI-PRIX) project is obtaining new evidence on the design and implementation of these schemes by: (i) undertaking a scoping review and classification of existing schemes, supplemented by interviews with national experts to identify schemes not in the published or gray literature; (ii) conducting a Delphi exercise with the key stakeholder groups involved in these schemes (payers, patient representatives, technology manufacturers, healthcare decision-makers), to identify the barriers and facilitators to developing schemes; and (iii) investigating several case studies to identify key learnings in the development of schemes. Results To date, more than 200 innovative pricing schemes have been identified across a broad range of technologies and applications. In addition, a novel classification has been developed to enable policymakers to search for schemes meeting specific objectives or having particular characteristics. Also, a preliminary search of the database of schemes, the Pay-for-Innovation Observatory (hiprixhorizon.eu), suggests that it will be possible to identify whether schemes with certain characteristics are more likely to be successful when applied to certain types of technologies (e.g., cell and gene therapies, rare disease treatments, medical devices), or designed to meet particular objectives, including equity enhancing purposes. Conclusions Despite the challenges, innovative payment schemes still represent one of the best approaches for facilitating the cost-effective introduction of new technologies under uncertainty. If policymakers can be assisted in selecting the best schemes to meet their particular objectives and are better informed of the main barriers and facilitators, then the success rate of these schemes will increase.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325100950
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP37 How Can We Make Innovative Payment Schemes Work? Findings Of A European Union Horizon Europe Project

Oriana Ciani, L Cavallaro, Vittoria Ardito, Michael Drummond
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

OP37 How Can We Make Innovative Payment Schemes Work? Findings Of A European Union Horizon Europe Project

Oriana Ciani, L Cavallaro, Vittoria Ardito, Michael Drummond
article en

Abstract

Introduction Innovative payment schemes have been widely proposed as a solution for dealing with uncertainties in cost and outcomes associated with the introduction of new health technologies. These schemes incorporate risk sharing, either by changing the method of paying for the health technology or by requesting more long-term evidence on outcomes. However, payers’ experiences with these schemes are mixed. Methods A work package of the Health Innovation Next Generation Payment and Pricing Models (HI-PRIX) project is obtaining new evidence on the design and implementation of these schemes by: (i) undertaking a scoping review and classification of existing schemes, supplemented by interviews with national experts to identify schemes not in the published or gray literature; (ii) conducting a Delphi exercise with the key stakeholder groups involved in these schemes (payers, patient representatives, technology manufacturers, healthcare decision-makers), to identify the barriers and facilitators to developing schemes; and (iii) investigating several case studies to identify key learnings in the development of schemes. Results To date, more than 200 innovative pricing schemes have been identified across a broad range of technologies and applications. In addition, a novel classification has been developed to enable policymakers to search for schemes meeting specific objectives or having particular characteristics. Also, a preliminary search of the database of schemes, the Pay-for-Innovation Observatory (hiprixhorizon.eu), suggests that it will be possible to identify whether schemes with certain characteristics are more likely to be successful when applied to certain types of technologies (e.g., cell and gene therapies, rare disease treatments, medical devices), or designed to meet particular objectives, including equity enhancing purposes. Conclusions Despite the challenges, innovative payment schemes still represent one of the best approaches for facilitating the cost-effective introduction of new technologies under uncertainty. If policymakers can be assisted in selecting the best schemes to meet their particular objectives and are better informed of the main barriers and facilitators, then the success rate of these schemes will increase.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.