Negative Prompts and the Affective Economies of Failure in Visual Generative AI Systems

Abstract Every negative prompt is an algorithmic ‘thou shalt not,’ an act of negating and negotiating what “we do not wish to see” in a generative media output. This study identifies negative prompts in text-to-image generative systems as a crucial site where the digital error discourse becomes materially realised. Employing a multimodal digital ethnographic approach, this paper seeks to understand how these prompts extend beyond their instrumental use to see how they are entangled with the notions of failure and repair in AI systems. Through close consideration of this tool, the paper contends that generative systems sustain user engagement through an affective economy of failure: where errors are rendered ordinary and becomes the burden of users while a relentless update culture naturalises the logic of ‘versions-as-evolutions,’ ultimately cultivating a sort of cruel optimism among its users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Baltic screen media review./Baltic screen media review
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/bsmr-2025-0003
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative Prompts and the Affective Economies of Failure in Visual Generative AI Systems

M Shuaib Mohamed Haneef, Cheeru Padma
Baltic screen media review./Baltic screen media review
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Negative Prompts and the Affective Economies of Failure in Visual Generative AI Systems

M Shuaib Mohamed Haneef, Cheeru Padma
article en

Abstract

Abstract Every negative prompt is an algorithmic ‘thou shalt not,’ an act of negating and negotiating what “we do not wish to see” in a generative media output. This study identifies negative prompts in text-to-image generative systems as a crucial site where the digital error discourse becomes materially realised. Employing a multimodal digital ethnographic approach, this paper seeks to understand how these prompts extend beyond their instrumental use to see how they are entangled with the notions of failure and repair in AI systems. Through close consideration of this tool, the paper contends that generative systems sustain user engagement through an affective economy of failure: where errors are rendered ordinary and becomes the burden of users while a relentless update culture naturalises the logic of ‘versions-as-evolutions,’ ultimately cultivating a sort of cruel optimism among its users.

Baltic screen media review./Baltic screen media reviewVol. 13(1)
Pondicherry University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.