421 The Current State of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in the UK: A Nationwide Survey

Abstract Aim This study aimed to describe the current state of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the UK, including training, practice trends, barriers to adoption, and views on robotics. Method An anonymous online survey was conducted between May and June 2025, targeting UK based endoscopists. Participants were recruited via professional societies and targeted emails. Results Twenty-eight eligible responses were analysed. Most respondents were gastroenterologists (79%) and predominantly male (82%). Responses were received from nearly all regions, with the largest proportions from Greater London (39%) and the South East (18%). Overall, 68% indicated they had completed an advanced fellowship (most commonly in the UK or Japan), and 82% had attended accredited ESD courses, with over half attending more than five. UGI ESD activity was predominantly low to medium volume (68%), while LGI ESD was more often performed at medium to high annual caseloads (61%). The majority routinely used tunnelling (93%) and traction-assisted techniques (82.1%). Most respondents used Narrow Band Imaging (93%) and white light endoscopy (86%) for lesion delineation, preferred colloidbased injection solutions (75%), and routinely added epinephrine (82%) and blue dye (100%). General anaesthesia was preferred for UGI ESD, conscious sedation for LGI ESD. Barriers to wider adoption included heavy workload (37%), low caseload (26%), and limited institutional support (19%). Nearly all respondents (93%) believed robotics have a future role, and 89% expressed interest in adopting robotic platforms. Conclusions These findings show established ESD expertise and training but highlight variable volumes and persistent barriers. Strong interest in robotics may help drive future adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.204
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

421 The Current State of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in the UK: A Nationwide Survey

Mark Runciman, Said Alyacoubi, George P. Mylonas, A. Darzi et al.
British journal of surgery
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

421 The Current State of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in the UK: A Nationwide Survey

Mark Runciman, Said Alyacoubi, George P. Mylonas, A. Darzi, Christopher John Peters, Nisha Patel, Mr Amyn Haji, Song Pil Hong
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim This study aimed to describe the current state of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the UK, including training, practice trends, barriers to adoption, and views on robotics. Method An anonymous online survey was conducted between May and June 2025, targeting UK based endoscopists. Participants were recruited via professional societies and targeted emails. Results Twenty-eight eligible responses were analysed. Most respondents were gastroenterologists (79%) and predominantly male (82%). Responses were received from nearly all regions, with the largest proportions from Greater London (39%) and the South East (18%). Overall, 68% indicated they had completed an advanced fellowship (most commonly in the UK or Japan), and 82% had attended accredited ESD courses, with over half attending more than five. UGI ESD activity was predominantly low to medium volume (68%), while LGI ESD was more often performed at medium to high annual caseloads (61%). The majority routinely used tunnelling (93%) and traction-assisted techniques (82.1%). Most respondents used Narrow Band Imaging (93%) and white light endoscopy (86%) for lesion delineation, preferred colloidbased injection solutions (75%), and routinely added epinephrine (82%) and blue dye (100%). General anaesthesia was preferred for UGI ESD, conscious sedation for LGI ESD. Barriers to wider adoption included heavy workload (37%), low caseload (26%), and limited institutional support (19%). Nearly all respondents (93%) believed robotics have a future role, and 89% expressed interest in adopting robotic platforms. Conclusions These findings show established ESD expertise and training but highlight variable volumes and persistent barriers. Strong interest in robotics may help drive future adoption.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.