416 A Single-Centre Evaluation of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative Staging Concordance in Patients Undergoing Combined Pancreatic and Vascular Resection for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Abstract Introduction Borderline-resectable pancreas cancer(BRPC) is defined by extent of peri-pancreatic vascular involvement. BRPC patients have been demonstrated to have improved survival outcomes when treated with neo-adjuvant systemic chemotherapy(NAC). Pre-operative anatomical interpretation to define those likely to benefit from NAC is a crucial step in ensuring patients undergo optimal treatments. Method A prospectively maintained surgical database was reviewed between 1/1/2020 and 31/12/2023. Patients with incomplete data were excluded. We reviewed pre-operative radiological(CT) and endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) reports to compare with intra-operative findings and post-operative histology. Results 19 patients underwent combined Whipple/Total Pancreatectomy and vascular(SMV/PV) resection: 8 underwent NAC, 1 was deemed physiologically inappropriate for NAC and 10 were intra-operatively diagnosed with vascular involvement. Of 8 patients undergoing NAC, pre-operative radiology described vessel abutment/contact in 100% and deformity in 63%; whereas, EUS identified vessel involvement in 63%. Histological vein involvement was confirmed in 7/8. The patient deemed physiologically inappropriate for NAC was reported as having vessel contact at CT and contour deformity on EUS; however, post-operative histology reported no venous involvement. All 10 operatively diagnosed patients were assessed as having no vessel involvement at pre-operative radiology/EUS; histology confirmed venous involvement in only 1. Conclusions Pre-operative anatomical interpretation and staging of BRPC remains crucial but challenging. In this subset of patients undergoing combined pancreatic/vascular resection, the optimum sensitivity/specificity was defined by pre-operative radiological assessment. Intra-operative diagnoses of vessel involvement were more likely due to inflammation/desmoplastic change. A multi-modal approach may improve accuracy of pre-operative assessment of vascular involvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.366
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

416 A Single-Centre Evaluation of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative Staging Concordance in Patients Undergoing Combined Pancreatic and Vascular Resection for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Daniel Liu, James Skipworth, Jonathan Rees, Reyad Abbadi et al.
British journal of surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

416 A Single-Centre Evaluation of Pre-Operative and Post-Operative Staging Concordance in Patients Undergoing Combined Pancreatic and Vascular Resection for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Daniel Liu, James Skipworth, Jonathan Rees, Reyad Abbadi, Andrei Tănăse, Andrew Strickland, Robbie Adamson, Hedi Karteszi, Sally Norton, Margaret Finch-Jones
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Borderline-resectable pancreas cancer(BRPC) is defined by extent of peri-pancreatic vascular involvement. BRPC patients have been demonstrated to have improved survival outcomes when treated with neo-adjuvant systemic chemotherapy(NAC). Pre-operative anatomical interpretation to define those likely to benefit from NAC is a crucial step in ensuring patients undergo optimal treatments. Method A prospectively maintained surgical database was reviewed between 1/1/2020 and 31/12/2023. Patients with incomplete data were excluded. We reviewed pre-operative radiological(CT) and endoscopic ultrasound(EUS) reports to compare with intra-operative findings and post-operative histology. Results 19 patients underwent combined Whipple/Total Pancreatectomy and vascular(SMV/PV) resection: 8 underwent NAC, 1 was deemed physiologically inappropriate for NAC and 10 were intra-operatively diagnosed with vascular involvement. Of 8 patients undergoing NAC, pre-operative radiology described vessel abutment/contact in 100% and deformity in 63%; whereas, EUS identified vessel involvement in 63%. Histological vein involvement was confirmed in 7/8. The patient deemed physiologically inappropriate for NAC was reported as having vessel contact at CT and contour deformity on EUS; however, post-operative histology reported no venous involvement. All 10 operatively diagnosed patients were assessed as having no vessel involvement at pre-operative radiology/EUS; histology confirmed venous involvement in only 1. Conclusions Pre-operative anatomical interpretation and staging of BRPC remains crucial but challenging. In this subset of patients undergoing combined pancreatic/vascular resection, the optimum sensitivity/specificity was defined by pre-operative radiological assessment. Intra-operative diagnoses of vessel involvement were more likely due to inflammation/desmoplastic change. A multi-modal approach may improve accuracy of pre-operative assessment of vascular involvement.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.