160 The Patient Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Day Case at a National Referral Centre; a 7 Month Evaluation of Outcomes

Abstract Aim With waiting times for surgery in Scotland increasing year on year, all trusts across the country can now refer patients to have laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed sooner at a national referral centre. Our aim was to evaluate the overall patient experience from decision for surgery to 30 days post-operatively. Method Retrospective analysis was performed of 191 patients who had laparoscopic cholecystectomies over a 7-month period. Their notes were examined for original referral dates and operation notes, biliary related admissions while awaiting surgery and post-operative complications within 30 days. Results Of the 191 patients, 5 (3%) had missing operation notes, 2 (1%) were abandoned, 1 (0.5%) was cancelled on the day, and 8 (4%) declined on the day. The average age of the patients was 51 (range 20-81), 81% of patients were female. The median number of days spent on the waiting list was 301 days (range 35 – 1961). Once referred to our centre, patients waited a median of 91 days. 5.2% (10 patients) had biliary related admission while awaiting their surgery. Examination of operative notes provided variable information, with 11% mentioning duodenal adhesions and two were entirely abandoned due to complexity. 2 post-operative complications were identified. These were graded at I and II on the clavien-dindo scale respectively. Conclusions Patients overall waiting time does not reach guideline targets. Patients waiting a long time increases cost on the NHS by increasing unnecessary pre-operative hospital admissions. Our data demonstrates an excellent safety profile of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy out-with their original healthboard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf270.250
Primary Topic
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

160 The Patient Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Day Case at a National Referral Centre; a 7 Month Evaluation of Outcomes

Rahee Mapara, Maciej Meszka, Eve Watt, Erin McIlveen
British journal of surgery
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
article

160 The Patient Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Day Case at a National Referral Centre; a 7 Month Evaluation of Outcomes

Rahee Mapara, Maciej Meszka, Eve Watt, Erin McIlveen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim With waiting times for surgery in Scotland increasing year on year, all trusts across the country can now refer patients to have laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed sooner at a national referral centre. Our aim was to evaluate the overall patient experience from decision for surgery to 30 days post-operatively. Method Retrospective analysis was performed of 191 patients who had laparoscopic cholecystectomies over a 7-month period. Their notes were examined for original referral dates and operation notes, biliary related admissions while awaiting surgery and post-operative complications within 30 days. Results Of the 191 patients, 5 (3%) had missing operation notes, 2 (1%) were abandoned, 1 (0.5%) was cancelled on the day, and 8 (4%) declined on the day. The average age of the patients was 51 (range 20-81), 81% of patients were female. The median number of days spent on the waiting list was 301 days (range 35 – 1961). Once referred to our centre, patients waited a median of 91 days. 5.2% (10 patients) had biliary related admission while awaiting their surgery. Examination of operative notes provided variable information, with 11% mentioning duodenal adhesions and two were entirely abandoned due to complexity. 2 post-operative complications were identified. These were graded at I and II on the clavien-dindo scale respectively. Conclusions Patients overall waiting time does not reach guideline targets. Patients waiting a long time increases cost on the NHS by increasing unnecessary pre-operative hospital admissions. Our data demonstrates an excellent safety profile of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy out-with their original healthboard.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_17)
Golden Jubilee National Hospital (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

160 The Patient Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Day Case at a National Referral Centre; a 7 Month Evaluation of Outcomes — Rahee Mapara, Maciej Meszka, et al. · British journal of surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS