PP44 Cost Effectiveness Of Canal-Wall-Down Mastoidectomy Followed By Hearing Reconstruction With Active Bone Conduction Implant For Patients With Cholesteatoma

Introduction Cholesteatoma is an abnormal skin growth within the middle ear that can destroy the ossicular chain and cause hearing loss. This study aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of canal-wall-down (CWD) mastoidectomy for cholesteatoma removal with or without hearing reconstruction using an active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (BCI) in patients with advanced cholesteatoma to support the design of a future clinical study. Methods A Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the following strategies: CWD without hearing reconstruction (CWD only); CWD with simultaneous BCI implantation (CWD+BCI0); CWD with implantation of BCI after one year (CWD+BCI1), two years (CWD+BCI2), three years (CWD+BCI3), or five years (CWD+BCI5). The outcomes evaluated over a lifetime were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (from the perspective of the National Health Fund, Poland), and net monetary benefit (NMB), assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of one gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Poland (PLN92,955 [USD53,422]). One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results. Cost and NMB results were presented in 2024 PLN and USD (conversion using purchasing power parities for GDP). Results The simulation indicated that CWD+BCI0 was expected to be the most effective strategy, yielding 18.35 QALYs, followed by CWD+BCI1, CWD+BCI2, CWD+BCI3, CWD+BCI5, and CWD only. The lifetime costs of performing CWD+BCI0 were expected to be lower than the costs of CWD+BCI1, CWD+BCI2, and CWD+BCI3. Moving from CWD only to CWD+BCI0 would incur an additional cost of PLN67,754 (USD38,939) over a lifetime to gain 3.13 QALYs. CWD+BCI0 resulted in the higher NMB (PLN1,595,530 [USD916,971]), followed by CWD+BCI1 (PLN1,578,976 [USD907,457]), CWD+BCI2 (PLN1,569,383 [USD901,944]), CWD+BCI3 (PLN1,560,090 [USD896,603]), CWD+BCI5 (PLN1,542,377 [USD886,424]), and CWD only (PLN1,372,572 [USD788,834]), respectively. DSA showed that the results were robust. Conclusions CWD with simultaneous hearing reconstruction using a BCI (CWD+BCI0) is expected to be the most cost effective strategy for patients with cholesteatoma in the Polish context. This result will support the design of a clinical study evaluating the surgical and audiological outcomes of the simultaneous approach.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325102638
Primary Topic
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP44 Cost Effectiveness Of Canal-Wall-Down Mastoidectomy Followed By Hearing Reconstruction With Active Bone Conduction Implant For Patients With Cholesteatoma

Érica Aranha Suzumura, A Hoch, Michael Urban
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
article

PP44 Cost Effectiveness Of Canal-Wall-Down Mastoidectomy Followed By Hearing Reconstruction With Active Bone Conduction Implant For Patients With Cholesteatoma

Érica Aranha Suzumura, A Hoch, Michael Urban
article en

Abstract

Introduction Cholesteatoma is an abnormal skin growth within the middle ear that can destroy the ossicular chain and cause hearing loss. This study aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of canal-wall-down (CWD) mastoidectomy for cholesteatoma removal with or without hearing reconstruction using an active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (BCI) in patients with advanced cholesteatoma to support the design of a future clinical study. Methods A Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the following strategies: CWD without hearing reconstruction (CWD only); CWD with simultaneous BCI implantation (CWD+BCI0); CWD with implantation of BCI after one year (CWD+BCI1), two years (CWD+BCI2), three years (CWD+BCI3), or five years (CWD+BCI5). The outcomes evaluated over a lifetime were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (from the perspective of the National Health Fund, Poland), and net monetary benefit (NMB), assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of one gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Poland (PLN92,955 [USD53,422]). One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results. Cost and NMB results were presented in 2024 PLN and USD (conversion using purchasing power parities for GDP). Results The simulation indicated that CWD+BCI0 was expected to be the most effective strategy, yielding 18.35 QALYs, followed by CWD+BCI1, CWD+BCI2, CWD+BCI3, CWD+BCI5, and CWD only. The lifetime costs of performing CWD+BCI0 were expected to be lower than the costs of CWD+BCI1, CWD+BCI2, and CWD+BCI3. Moving from CWD only to CWD+BCI0 would incur an additional cost of PLN67,754 (USD38,939) over a lifetime to gain 3.13 QALYs. CWD+BCI0 resulted in the higher NMB (PLN1,595,530 [USD916,971]), followed by CWD+BCI1 (PLN1,578,976 [USD907,457]), CWD+BCI2 (PLN1,569,383 [USD901,944]), CWD+BCI3 (PLN1,560,090 [USD896,603]), CWD+BCI5 (PLN1,542,377 [USD886,424]), and CWD only (PLN1,372,572 [USD788,834]), respectively. DSA showed that the results were robust. Conclusions CWD with simultaneous hearing reconstruction using a BCI (CWD+BCI0) is expected to be the most cost effective strategy for patients with cholesteatoma in the Polish context. This result will support the design of a clinical study evaluating the surgical and audiological outcomes of the simultaneous approach.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.