PP29 Contextualizing Gene Therapy Educational Resources For Hemophilia Patients In Brazil: Translation Process And Preliminary Qualitative Patient Preferences Findings

Introduction Decision-making in the context of health technology assessment (HTA) of gene therapies for hemophilia needs to be tailored toward patients’ preferences. To promote equitable and patient-centered decision-making, it is crucial to provide patients with culturally attuned educational materials to ensure comprehension of key aspects of gene therapy so they can make legitimate and informed treatment decisions based on their preferences. Methods In this mixed methods study, we used a contextualization approach to translate the educational tool from the PAVING study (Patient Preferences to Assess Value IN Gene Therapies in Hemophilia) into Brazilian Portuguese. Translated versions were reviewed by a hematologist, a patient association representative, and two industry professionals. The tool was subsequently piloted with two people with hemophilia (PWH). After revisions, the tool was virtually presented to 12 PWH to transfer knowledge in preparation for the interview about their willingness to receive gene therapy. They were also required to perform the attribute-ranking exercise from the PAVING study. Results The translation process led to minor adaptations required for local context. The original version designed for computer use was adapted for use on a mobile phone. Pilot testing with PWH resulted in minor changes to optimize clickstreams. Ten participants indicated some baseline awareness of gene therapy for hemophilia (good n=2; reasonable n=3; bad or very bad n=5). Participants indicated a general willingness to receive gene therapy (very willing n=7; willing n=2; neutral n=3). The six top-ranked treatment attributes were “effect on factor level,” “dose frequency,” “impact on daily life,” “probability that prophylaxis can be stopped after treatment,” and “effect on annual bleeding rate.” Conclusions These findings may contribute to further developments of the design and contextualization of hemophilia educational resources of gene therapy. The preliminary results on patient preferences will also inform future quantitative preference studies to be considered in the decision-making related to individual care and to reimbursement and coverage decisions in health systems, thus incorporating the patient perspective in HTA processes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462325102481
Primary Topic
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP29 Contextualizing Gene Therapy Educational Resources For Hemophilia Patients In Brazil: Translation Process And Preliminary Qualitative Patient Preferences Findings

Mariana Rocha Alves, Gabriela G Yamaguti-Hayakawa, Daniela Vianna Pachito, Carla Fabrine Carvalho et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
article

PP29 Contextualizing Gene Therapy Educational Resources For Hemophilia Patients In Brazil: Translation Process And Preliminary Qualitative Patient Preferences Findings

Mariana Rocha Alves, Gabriela G Yamaguti-Hayakawa, Daniela Vianna Pachito, Carla Fabrine Carvalho, Joana Balardin, Ana Dantas, Rafael Feitoza, Tania Maria Tania Maria Onzi Pietrobelli
article en

Abstract

Introduction Decision-making in the context of health technology assessment (HTA) of gene therapies for hemophilia needs to be tailored toward patients’ preferences. To promote equitable and patient-centered decision-making, it is crucial to provide patients with culturally attuned educational materials to ensure comprehension of key aspects of gene therapy so they can make legitimate and informed treatment decisions based on their preferences. Methods In this mixed methods study, we used a contextualization approach to translate the educational tool from the PAVING study (Patient Preferences to Assess Value IN Gene Therapies in Hemophilia) into Brazilian Portuguese. Translated versions were reviewed by a hematologist, a patient association representative, and two industry professionals. The tool was subsequently piloted with two people with hemophilia (PWH). After revisions, the tool was virtually presented to 12 PWH to transfer knowledge in preparation for the interview about their willingness to receive gene therapy. They were also required to perform the attribute-ranking exercise from the PAVING study. Results The translation process led to minor adaptations required for local context. The original version designed for computer use was adapted for use on a mobile phone. Pilot testing with PWH resulted in minor changes to optimize clickstreams. Ten participants indicated some baseline awareness of gene therapy for hemophilia (good n=2; reasonable n=3; bad or very bad n=5). Participants indicated a general willingness to receive gene therapy (very willing n=7; willing n=2; neutral n=3). The six top-ranked treatment attributes were “effect on factor level,” “dose frequency,” “impact on daily life,” “probability that prophylaxis can be stopped after treatment,” and “effect on annual bleeding rate.” Conclusions These findings may contribute to further developments of the design and contextualization of hemophilia educational resources of gene therapy. The preliminary results on patient preferences will also inform future quantitative preference studies to be considered in the decision-making related to individual care and to reimbursement and coverage decisions in health systems, thus incorporating the patient perspective in HTA processes.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 41(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.